Topic 7 - Pluralism Flashcards

1
Q

What beliefs is christianity built upon?

A

No one can reach God or deserve salvation by their own efforts

Jesus was God thus Christianity is superior

Religions say different things, they cannot all be right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why for exclusivists can no one achieve salvation by there own efforts?

A

human beings are fallen because original sin

‘For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.’
Romans 3:23

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What God do exclusivists believe in?

A

Exclusivists believe in an immanent God who intervenes in the world at particular times and places through theophanies (visions of God) and through miracles. This means that although God is omnipresent he is present in a more knowable way at some points and times than at others. God intervenes in the world to make himself known because he desires that people come to know him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is fundamental to the exclusivist view?

A

Jesus was God incarnate

They argue that this makes Christianity superior to non-Christian religions which are based on prophets rather than on God himself and is the mediator between God and humans

‘I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me’.
John 14:6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how are inclusivists similar yet different over jesus being god incarnate

A

Inclusivists like Rahner agree that salvation is only possible through Jesus and they agree that Jesus should be viewed as God incarnate. However, they would point out that Jesus died for the sins of the whole world. Rahner argued that if God genuinely wants all people to be saved then salvation must be attainable by those who have no opportunity to be Christian. Therefore, whilst Rahner thinks that Jesus brought God’s grace into the world he says that it can then be mediated (shared out) by non-Christian religions. An inclusivist might argue that the quotation from John only says that salvation is dependent on Jesus. It does not say that Jesus must himself be known.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how do exclusivists believe is the only way to be saved??

A

Many exclusivists believe that in addition to having explicit faith in Christ you also need to be a member of the institution of the Church to be saved.

The institution of the Church mediates God’s grace via the sacraments. For example, in the Eucharist the blessed bread and wine undergo transubstantiation and become the body and blood of Jesus. The believer who then takes communion receives the grace of God into their body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what do exclusivists believe happens to non-believers?

A

The ethical problems with preaching that non-Christians go to hell was one that the early Christians are aware of. They, like many more recent exclusivists, came to the conclusion that this is why missionary activity was essential part of being a Christian.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

karl Barth exclusivist yes -

A

barth represents ambiguity between exclusivist and inclusivism

His emphasis on the the singular importance of Jesus and the utter dependence on Christ for Salvation are beliefs that exclusivists would share. Also, wrote the Barman Declaration in 1934 where he said “Jesus is the one Word of God. There are no other sources of revelation.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

karl Barth exclusivist no -

A

Barth’s belief in God’s freedom which means that God could reveal himself through anything if he chose implies that it must at least be possible for God to reveal himself through non-Christian religions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how does david hume criticise exclusivism?

A

argued that miracles can never be good evidence for God because how ever unlikely the event appears a rational explanation will always be more plausible than the idea that a miracle actually happened. By the same token, however much evidence there appears to be for Jesus’ divinity it will always be more likely that there is a rational explanation for things like the virgin birth and the resurrection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how does d’costa criticise exclusivism?

A

makes the point that exclusivism ignores the idea of the Trinity. To say that God can only be known through Jesus is binatarian because it ignores the role of the Trinity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is inclusivism?

A

God is loving and fair so must make it possible for all people to be saved.

Religions have significant differences (so cannot all be true) but also have significant similarities (implying some shared knowledge).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why would inclusivists say they’re best

A

Inclusivists would say that their position is superior to pluralism because it maintains the unique position of Jesus and of the Church and it does not ignore the fact that religions sometimes teach opposing things.

They would also say that their position is superior to exclusivism because it follows on naturally from Christian principles that exclusivists seem to ignore (e.g. it takes into account that God is loving, that he created the world and that Jesus died for all). Furthermore, it encourages positive attitudes to non-Christians.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is rahner’s version of inclusivism (main version of inclusivism) 1/2

A

Christianity is the one absolute religion.

Jesus died for human sin and enables people to be saved through grace. Jesus’ death was necessary for salvation.

This grace can then be mediated through non-Christian religions. Religions which mediate God’s grace are lawful religions.

Non-Christians who behave in a ‘Christian’ type way already have God’s grace acting in their life and should be regarded as anonymous Christians.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is rahner’s version of inclusivism (main version of inclusivism) 2/2

A

In this way the Church is not confined to the visible institution of the Church but is comprised of those whose behaviour and values reflect those of a Christian.

Rahner supports his view by arguing that God is revealed both through creation and through history and that this is made clear in the Old Testament.

This means God’s grace is available outside Christianity. He says that Christianity has a historical starting point in time so clearly cannot be the way of salvation for all mankind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what do inclusvists mean by anonymous christianity?

A

Idea of Rahner

refers to anyone who follows their non-christian religion is actually a blind christian

17
Q

how would von balthasar criticise rahners inclusivism?

A

argued that Rahner has reduced being a Christian to acting virtuously. This arguably gets perilously close to promoting the idea that you are saved because you are a good person. Rahner of course would respond that you are saved by implicit faith in God’s grace, the good actions come from that, they are not the thing that saves you. However, consider whether you think Von Balthasar’s criticism is fair. Is being a Christian more than leading a certain type of life? Does it not have to involve a degree of faith.

18
Q

how does alan race criticise rahners inclusvisim?

A

‘to say that one religion contains the fulest expression of religious truth and value, without any recourse to the empirical data of the other religions themselves, is tantamount to unjustified theological imperialism.’

19
Q

how does hick criticise inclusivism and exclusivism?

A

argues that the term ‘son of God’ was a metaphor which was intended to show that Jesus behaved in a godly way. He says that it was only later that it was taken literally.

20
Q

what does hick say about pluralism?

A

elephant example - many different religious traditions can be seen of value and can lead to salvation. These difference are only superficial and they are aiming of the same good

so hick called for a ‘capernican’ revolution = shift away from the view only christianity is correct

21
Q

how does christianity (the bible) criticise pluralism?

A

we believe in one God, father almighty and in his Son, Jesus Christ, conceived by the Holy Spirit… (the creed)

22
Q

how does hick build on kant?

A

noumena/phenomena

Kant distinguished between a ‘thing in itself’ and a ‘thing as we experience it’. He called the former ‘noumena’ and the latter ‘phenomena’.

Hick said that distinguishing between noumena and phenoman enables us to make sense of the idea that all religions are talking about the same reality although they may do it in different ways.

23
Q

how would keith ward criticise pluralism?

A

argued that Hick’s ‘hard pluralism’ is incoherent. He said that if we cannot know what the Real is like then we cannot know that the world’s religions are valid interpretations of it.

24
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 1

restrictive access exclusivism, only christianity leads to salvation (calvin + luther)

A

A: Controlling beliefs, The Fall
• Although respectful of other religions, they only “often reflect a ray of the Truth” as they lack the necessary controlling beliefs e.g. sola christus, fides ex auditu
• Exclusivist attitudes often associated with Calvin and Luther, and their strong adherence to humans being wholly corrupt due to the Fall, and unable to receive salvation independently – NEED God’s grace and acceptance of Jesus and Son of God

25
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 1 - counter argument

Unknowable mystery of God; if humans are fallen how can we know the truth of God/ salvation anyway (barth)

A

• Barth’s emphasis on the ultimate unknowable mystery of God leads to theological agnosticism and incoherency; seems paradoxical to argue RAE offers the truth when it is based upon the belief that humanity is fallen, thus suggesting we are unable to reach full truth of God anyway

26
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 1 - counter response

salvation of the elect through christ,God’s love (acts 4:12)

A
  • As humanity is sinful, it is only those who hear the gospel (fides ex auditu) and respond (the elect) that can be saved – those who do not have the opportunity are undeserved anyway
  • God demonstrates his selfless, undeserved act of love through offering salvation to the elect through Jesus’s redemption for our sins on the cross – although we are fallen, some are still given the chance to reach the Beatific Vision
  • “There is salvation in no one else (Acts 4:12)
27
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 1 - conclusive response

salvation of the elect through christ,God’s love (acts 4:12)

A
  • As humanity is sinful, it is only those who hear the gospel (fides ex auditu) and respond (the elect) that can be saved – those who do not have the opportunity are undeserved anyway
  • God demonstrates his selfless, undeserved act of love through offering salvation to the elect through Jesus’s redemption for our sins on the cross – although we are fallen, some are still given the chance to reach the Beatific Vision
  • “There is salvation in no one else (Acts 4:12)
28
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 1 - conclusive response

based on the assumption that jesus was the literal son of god, threat of intellectual ignorance (hick)

A
  • Christian exclusivism can be argued to be internally coherent – IF Jesus is God incarnate, then it would make sense to claim that Christianity has the truth about God. However, this is based on a rather large, un-provable (unlikely) assumption – that Jesus was genuinely the Son of God. John Hick argues that Jesus never claimed to be the Son of God and the title was used in an honourific sense to make the point that Jesus acted in a God-like way. Instead, Jesus should be seen as a “gift to the world” as a teacher of wisdom, and not a source of exclusive truth about God.
  • By taking a Christocentric approach, exclusivists not only overlook the idea of a loving God who would want all the to be saved, but also cause practical issues in 21st century multi-faith societies where people hold a variety of beliefs due to gloablisation – intellectually ignorant and pose threat of religious conflict and intolerance.
29
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 2

pluralism, multiple interpretations of the truth. (kant, bultmann + wittgenstein)

A
  • Kant’s epistemology can be used to illustrate his argument – due to differences in culture or situation, the Noumena of the divine (the Real) is experienced through different Phenomena (religions) each religion holds equally valid interpretations of the truth, illustrated by Wittgenstein’s duck-rabbit picture (Wittgenstein’s language games – value and meaning of words is subjective to the game in which they are played; all religions have different, equally meaningful games)
  • Copernican revolution must take place to shift theology away from a Christological bias, based on dmythologisation of the Christian narrative – traced back to 20th century New Testament scholar Rudolf Bultmann, Gospels contain essential truths expressed through myths
  • Jesus is not unique in Hick’s eyes and thus the arguments for Christ as the only path to salvation go unwarranted
30
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 2 - counter argument

conservative christians argue hick’s de-mythologising of events such as the virgin birth and resurrection devalue the bible and remove eschatological significance

A

relativizes Christian beliefs, undermines what religious people think themselves.

31
Q

ESSAY PLAN - PLURALISM

POINT 2 - conclusive response

ethical theological pluralism (knitter)

A
  • Paul Knitter believes all religions have the same soteriological aim of liberating humans from suffering, injustice, intolerance and falsehood; religions are ‘soteriocentric’ and not Reality-centred. ETP is inspired by liberation theology and believes the primary purpose of a religious community is praxis – action against injustice.
  • We should not be denying or forgetting about different religious beliefs, but instead we should recognise differences between them which can lead to creative and fruitful dialogue. Dialogue will enhance and develop each religions’ distinctive interpretation of reality – all that is required is that different religions are open to new interpretations and share their common desire for a better world.
32
Q

point 2 inclusivity

A
  • “God our saviour… wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth” (1 Timothy)
  • Karl Rahner, in “Theological Investigations”, through his concept of structural inclusivism, has argued that “a non-Christian religion can be recognised as a lawful religion” if the religion’s structures develop an openness to God’s grace i.e. through encouraging moral behaviour
  • Judgement based on action not belief – Sheep and the Goats
  • Rahner develops Aquinas’ notion of the votum ecclesia – by wanting grace through following another religion you can receive God’s grace.
33
Q

point 2 counter d’costa

A

• Undermines fundamental controlling beliefs such as fides ex auditu and extra ecclesiam nulla salus D’Costa argues a central part of being a Christian is being able to repent sins and seek forgiveness by responding to the Gospel via the Church. How could someone implicitly confess their sins and receive God’s grace if they do not identify as Christian or go to Church.

34
Q

counter response point 2

moral action only good if confirms christianity

A

• Rahner adheres to the “Solus Chritus” principle, arguing that it was Jesus’ atonement that allows people to be saved through grace, yet realises that other religions can mediate God’s grace (as outlined in the 1995 CoE Doctrine, “Mystery of Salvation”)

35
Q

collapses into exclusivism conclusive response point 2

A
  • Rahner’s inclusivism is patronising towards other religions, as it suggests only Christ is the truth. Equally, other religions are not respected on their own merits – people must adhere to the teachings and values of Christ.
  • Gavin D’Costa, in “Christianity and World Religions” offers a more convincing alternative to inclusivism by arguing that seeing Christ as the only path to salvation (Christomonism) is misleading and ignores the role of the Holy Spirit. If a successful inclusivist doctrine is to be formed, one must look past the figure of Christ alone, to the Holy Spirit within the Trinity. The Holy Spirit may well reveal itself through other means and so other religions may possess truths Christianity can learn from
  • Avoids problems wit Rahner’s “anonymous Christianity” and encourages inter-faith dialogue.