Chapter 10- The Concept of Measurement Flashcards

1
Q

Measurement

A

the process of assigning numbers or labels to persons, objects, or events in accordance with specific rules for representing quantities or qualities of attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rule

A

a guide, a method, or a command that tells a researcher what to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Measurement Process

A
  1. Identify Concept of interest
  2. Develop a construct
  3. Create a constitutive definition
  4. Develop an operational definition
  5. Create a measurement scale
  6. Evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale
  7. Utilize the scale
  8. Collect research findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Construct

A

specific types of concepts that exist at higher levels of abstraction than do everyday concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Constitutive definition

A

a statement of meaning of the central idea or concept under the study, establishing its boundaries; also known as theoretical, or conceptual, definiton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Operational definition

A

specifies which observable characteristics will be measured and the process for assigning a value to the concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Construct Equivalence

A

how people see, understand, and develop measurements of a particular phenomenon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Scale

A

set of symbols or numbers so constructed that the symbols or numbers can be assigned by a rule to the individuals (or their behaviors/attitudes) to whom the scale is applied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nominal scales

A

partitions data into categories that are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive, implying that every bit of data will fit into one and only one category and that all data will fit somewhere on the scale;

uses numerals to identify objects, individuals, events or groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ordinal scales

A

scales that maintain the labeling characteristics of nominal scales and have the ability to order data

in addition to identification, provides information about the relative amount of some characteristic possessed by an event, object, etc, (order)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interval scales

A

contain all the features of ordinal scales with the added dimension that the intervals between the points are equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ratio scales

A

have all the characteristics of other scales as well as a meaningful absolute zero or origin so that magnitudes can be compared arithmetically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are 8 errors in validity of measurements

A
  1. A true difference in the characteristic being measured
  2. Differences due to stable characteristics of individual respondents such as personality, values, and intelligence
  3. Differences due to short-term personal factors such as mood swings, health problems etc.
  4. Differences caused by situational factors such as distractions or others present in the interview situation
  5. Differences resulting from variations in administering the survey
  6. Differences due to the sampling of items included in the questionnaire
  7. Differences due to the sampling of items included in the questionnaire
    Differences due to a lack of clarity in the measurement instrument
  8. Differences due to mechanical or instrument factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reliability

A

the degree to which measures are free from random error and, therefore, provide consistent data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are 3 ways to assess reliability?

A

test-retest reliability, the use of equivalent forms, and internal consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

test-retest reliability

A

ability of the same instrument to produce consistent results when used a second time under conditions as similar as possible to the original conditions

17
Q

equivalent form reliability

A

ability of two very similar forms of an instrument to produce closely correlated results

18
Q

internal consistency reliability

A

assesses the ability to produce similar results when different samples are used to measure a phenomenon during the same time period

19
Q

split-half technique

A

method of assessing the reliability of a scale by dividing the total set of measurement items in half and correlating the results

20
Q

validity

A

the degree to which the researcher was trying to measure what was actually measured

21
Q

face validity

A

the weakest form of validity- degree to which a measurement seems to measure what is supposed to measure

22
Q

content validity

A

representativeness, or sampling adequacy, of the content of the measurement instrument

23
Q

criterion-related validity

A

degree to which a measurement instrument can predict a variable that is designated a criterion

24
Q

predictive validity

A

degree to which a future level of criterion variable can be forecast by a current measurement scale
NOT IN SG

25
Q

concurrent validity

A

degree to which another variable, measured at the same point in time as the variable of interest, can be predicted by the measurement instrument
NOT IN SG

26
Q

construct validity

A

degree to which as measurement instrument represents and logically connects, via the underlying theory, the observed phenomenon to the construct

27
Q

convergent validity

A

the degree of correlation among different measurement instruments that purport to measure the same construct

28
Q

discriminant validity

A

measure of the lack of association among constructs that are supposed to be different

29
Q

cronbach’s alpha technique

A

involves computing mean reliability coefficient estimates for all possible ways of splitting a set of items in half