Section 3 - Business Economics Flashcards

1
Q

Production

A

> Production means manufacturing something in order to sell it.
Production involves converting inputs (e.g. raw materials, labour) into outputs (things to sell).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Input

A

> The inputs can be any of the four factors of production - land, labour, capital and enterprise.
Inputs can be tangible or intangible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tangible

A

> Things you can touch, like raw materials or machines.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intangible

A

> ‘Abstract’ things that can’t be touched - like ideas, talent or knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Output

A

> The outputs produced should have an exchangeable value - they need to be something that can be sold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Productivity

A

> Productivity is a way of measuring how efficiently a company or an economy is producing its output.
It’s defined as the output per unit input employed. So if one company could take the same amount of inputs as the other company, but produce more stuff, their productivity would be greater.
You can work out overall level of productivity (involving all four possible inputs) or productivity f any one of the four individual factors of production.
Improving productivity of any one of these separate factors should increase overall production.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Labour productivity - definition

A

> Output per worker or per hour worked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Labour productivity - how to calculate

A
  1. Take the amount of output produced in a particular time.

2. Divide this by the total number of workers (or per worker-hour).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does labour productivity allow?

A

> Labour productivity allows workers to be compared against other workers.
E.g. labour productivity is calculated for whole economies, so that the productivity of different labour forces can be compared.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can labour productivity be improved?

A
  1. Better training.
  2. More experience.
  3. Improved technology.
    >Specialisation can also improve labour productivity - if each worker performs tasks that they are good at doing, have practised a lot and have been trained to do, then they’ll produce more than if they did lots of different tasks.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Specialisation

A

> Division of labour is a type of specialisation where production is split into different tasks and specific people are allocated to each task.
Adam Smith explained the increase in productivity that could be achieved through the division of labour. He said that one untrained worker wouldn’t even make 20 pins a day, but 10 workers, specialising in different tasks could make 48,000.
There are advantages and disadvantages of specialisation, but overall an economy can produce more stuff if people and firms specialise.
It’s not just individuals and firms that can specialise - whole regions and even countries can specialise to an extent. E.g, there are loads of technology companies based in Silicon Valley in California.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Advantages of specialisation

A
  1. People can specialise in the thing they’re best as or by doing it, they learn to become better at it.
  2. This can lead to better quality and a higher quantity of products for the same amount of effort overall i.e. - increased labour productivity.
  3. Specialisation is one way in which firms can achieve economies of scale e.g. a production line (where each person may perform just one or two tasks) is a form of specialisation.
  4. Specialisation leads to more efficient production - this helps to tackle the problem of scarcity, because if resources are used more efficiently, more output can be produced per unit of input.
  5. Training costs are reduced if workers are only trained to perform certain limited tasks.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disadvantages of specialisation

A
  1. Workers can end up doing repetitive tasks, which can lead to boredom.
  2. Countries can become less self-sufficient - this can be a problem if trade is disrupted for whatever reason (e.g. a war or dispute). E.g. if a country specialises in manufacturing, and imports (rather than producing) all its fuel, then that country could be in trouble if it falls out with its fuel supplier.
  3. It can lead to a lack of flexibility - e.g. if the companies eventually move elsewhere, the workforce left behind can struggle to adapt.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Link between trade and specialisation

A

> Specialisation means that trade becomes absolutely vital - economies (and individuals and firms) have to be able to obtain the things they’re no longer making for themselves. This means it’s necessary to have a way of exchanging goods and services between countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Trade

A

> Swapping goods with other countries is one way a country can get what it needs.
This way of trading goods is called a barter system - it’s very inefficient because it takes a lot of time and effort to find traders to barter with.
The most efficient way of exchanging goods and services between countries is using money (with the use of exchange rates where necessary).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Money - definition

A

> Money is a medium of exchange - it’s something both buyers and sellers value and that means that countries can buy goods, even if sellers don’t want the things that the buying country produces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Money’s other functions

A

> Money has 3 other functions too:

  1. A measure of value - e.g. the value given to a good can be measured in US dollars.
  2. A store of value - e.g. an individual who receives a wage may wait before buying something if they know that the money they have will be of similar value in the future.
  3. A standard (or method) of deferred payment - money can be paid at a later date for something that’s consumed know, e.g. people often borrow money to buy a car or pay university fees.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Firms - definition

A

> A firm is any sort of business organisation, like a family-run factory, a dental practice or a supermarket chain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Industry - definition

A

> An industry is all the firms providing similar goods or services.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What do markets contain?

A

> A market contains all the firms supplying a particular good or service and the firms or people buying it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Firms

A

> Firms generate revenue (money coming in) by selling their output (goods or services).
Producing this output uses factors of production, and this has a cost.
The profit a firm makes is its total revenue minus its total costs.
In the long run firms need to make profit to survive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What do economists include in the cost of production?

A

> Opportunity cost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Economists and the cost of production

A

> When economists talk about the cost of production they are referring to the economic cost of producing the output.
The economic cost includes the money cost of factors of production that have to be paid for, but also the opportunity cost of the factors that aren’t paid for (e.g. a home office that a business is run from).
The opportunity cost of a factor of production is the money that you could have got by putting it to its next best use.
E.g. if you run your own business the money you could earn doing other work is the opportunity cost of your labour.
So, in economics, cost isn’t just a calculation of money spent - it takes into account all of the effort and resources that have gone into production.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The opportunity cost of a factor of production

A

> The opportunity cost of a factor of production is the money that you could have got by putting it to its next best use.
E.g. if you run your own business the money you could earn doing other work is the opportunity cost of your labour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Short run

A

> The short run is the period of time when at least one of a firm’s factors of production is fixed.
The short run isn’t a specific length of time - it varies from firm to firm.
E.g. the short run of a cycle courier service could be a week because it can hire new staff with their own bikes quickly, but a steel manufacturer might have a short run of several years because it takes lots of time and money to build a new steel-manufacturing plant.
Costs can be fixed or variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Long run

A

> The long run is a period of time when all factors of production can be varied.
In the long run all costs are variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What can costs be in short run?

A

> Fixed or variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Fixed costs

A

> Fixed costs don’t vary with output in the short run - they have to be paid whether or not anything is produced.
E.g. the rent on a shop is a fixed cost - it’s the same no matter what the sales are.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Variable costs

A

> Variable costs do vary with output - they increase as output increases,
The cost of the plastic bags that a shop gives to customers is a variable cost - the higher sales are, the higher the overall cost of the bags.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Total cost

A

> The total cost (TC) for a particular output level is the total fixed costs (TFC) plus the variable costs (TVC) for that output level:
TC = TFC + TVC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Average cost

A

> Average cost (AC) a.k.a. average total cost (ATC) is the cost per unit produced.
AC is calculated by dividing total costs by the quantity produced (Q): AC = TC/Q.
Average fixed cost (AFC) = TFC/Q.
Average variable cost (AVC) = TVC/Q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Marginal cost - definition

A

> Marginal cost (MC) is the extra cost incurred as a result of producing the final unit of output.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Marginal cost

A

> Marginal cost is only affected by variable costs - fixed costs have to be paid even if nothing is produced.
You can calculate it by finding the difference between total cost at the current output level (TCn) and total cost at one unit less (TCn-1):
MC = TCn - TCn-1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

More general formula for MC

A

MC = Change in TC / Change in quantity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Trend of MC

A

> Marginal cost decreases initially as output increase, then begins to increase in the short run because of the law of diminishing returns.
So the MC curve is always u-shaped.
Changes in MC affect average cost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

How does MC affect AC?

A
  1. When the MC is lower than the AC, the AC will be falling. This is because each extra unit produced will decrease the average cost (adding something smaller than the average will decrease the average).
  2. When the MC is higher than the AC, the AC will be rising because each extra unit produced will increase the average cost.
  3. So the MC curve meets the AC curve at the lowest AC, i.e. AC will be lowest when MC = AC - this is the point of productive efficiency.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Other than the average cost curve, which other curve does the marginal cost curve cross?

A

> The MC curve also meets the AVC curve at the minimum AVC.
Marginal cost is made up of variable costs, so it increases and decreases AVC in the same way it does AC.
This means AVC and AC curves also always form a u-shape in the short run - they both decrease until they reach a a minimum, then begin to increase.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

AFC Curve

A

> AFC falls as output rises because the total fixed cost is spread across the greater output.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What are increases in output limited by in the short run?

A

> Diminishing returns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What does the law of diminishing returns explain?

A

> The law of diminishing returns explains what happens when a variable factor of production increases while other factors stay fixed. Because at least one factor stays fixed, the law of diminishing returns only applies in the short run.
When you increase one factor of production by one unit, but keep the others fixed, the extra output you get is called the marginal product.
E.g. if you add one more unit of labour, the extra output is the marginal product of labour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Marginal product - definition

A

> Marginal product (MP) is the additional output produced by adding one more unit of a factor input.
I.e. by adding one more unit of any of the factors of production being used.
Another term for marginal product is marginal returns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Increasing output - MP and law of diminishing returns explaination

A
  1. Initially, as you add more of a factor of production the marginal product will increase - each unit of input added will add more output than before.
  2. This might happen because more specialisation is possible with more of a particular factor. As more people are employed, for example, they can specialise in carrying out particular tasks.
  3. Eventually, if you keep adding units of one factor of production, the other fixed factors will begin to limit the additional output you get, and the marginal product will begin to fall. E.g. if a clothes manufacturer only has 5 sewing machines, employing a 6th machinist will probably add less output than employing the 5th did, and employing a 7th will add even less.
    >This is the point of diminishing returns - the point where marginal product begins to decrease as input increases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Law of diminishing returns - key

A

> If one variable factor of production is increased while other factors stay fixed, eventually the marginal returns from the variable factor will begin to decrease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Law of diminishing returns says..

Plus other names

A

> The law of diminishing returns says that there is always a point where marginal product begins to decrease.
Law of diminishing marginal returns.
Law of variable proportions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What does marginal returns do to marginal cost?

A

> Increases it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Marginal returns or marginal product - relation to marginal cost

A

> MP is related to the marginal cost.
As marginal returns rise, marginal cost falls.
As marginal returns fall, marginal cost rises.
The MC curve is a mirror image of the MP curve.
MC will rise as marginal returns fall because, ceteris paribus, if you’re getting less additional output from each unit of input then the per unit of that output will be greater.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What does diminishing marginal returns eventually cause?

A

> Productivity to fall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Diminishing returns and productivity

A

> The Law of diminishing returns says that as the level of a variable factor input is increased, MP will eventually begin to diminish.
As the level of that factor input continues to be increased, the average product will eventually start to fall too. The MP curve always meets the AP curve when AP curve is at its max.
The average product is also known as productivity.
E.g. if the variable factor is labour, the labour productivity would be the average output per worker. So if a firm employs more and more people, it will eventually find that the productivity of those employees falls.
If you keep adding more of the variable factor, you can even reach a stage where adding further input results in a fall in the total product. (MP becomes negative).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Average product

A

> AP is the output produced per unit of factor input.

50
Q

Total product

A

> TP is the total output produced using a particular combination of factor inputs.

51
Q

How can productivity be improved?

A

> There are various ways to increase labour productivity - e.g. through better training or better management.
Improved technology can also help improve productivity - faster computers could allow employees to achieve more during their working day, for example.
Increasing productivity will allow a firm to reduce its costs of production.
Improved technology might also allow a firm to track its costs and productivity more accurately, meaning it can see when it’s encountering the point of diminishing returns.

52
Q

Economies of Scale - definition

A

> An economy is experiencing economies of scale when the average cost of production is falling as output rises.

53
Q

Intro -economies of scale

A

> The average cost to a firm of making something is usually quite high if they don’t make very many of them.
But in the long run, the more of those things the firm makes, the more the average cost of making each one falls.
Economies of scale - the cost advantages of production on a large scale.

54
Q

2 categories economies of scale can be divided into two categories?

A
  1. Internal.

2. External

55
Q

Internal economies of scale

A

> Internal economies of scale involve changes within a firm:

  1. Technical Economies of Scale.
  2. Purchasing Economies of Scale.
  3. Managerial Economies of Scale.
  4. Financial Economies of Scale.
  5. Risk-bearing Economies of Scale.
  6. Marketing Economies of Scale.
56
Q

Internal: Technical Economies of Scale

A

> Production line methods can be used by large firms to make a lot of things at a very low average price.
Large firms can purchase specialised equipment to help reduce AC.
Workers can specialise (become more efficient at their task) - might not be possible for small firm.
Another potential economy of scale arises from the law of increased dimensions.

57
Q

Law of increased dimensions

A

> The price you pay for a new warehouse might be closely related to the total area of the walls and roof, say.
If you make the dimensions of the walls and roof twice as big, the total area of the walls and roof will be 4 times greater so will cost about 4 times as much to build.
But the volume of the warehouse will be 8 times greater, meaning that you’re getting more storage space for each pound you spend.
Same is true for things like oil tankers - e.g. bigger tankers reduce the cost of transporting each unit of oil.

58
Q

Internal: Purchasing Economies of Scale.

A

> Larger firms making lots of good will need larger quantities of raw materials, and so can often negotiate with suppliers.
As large firms will be most important customers of suppliers, they’ll be able to drive a hard bargain.

59
Q

Internal: Managerial Economies of Scale.

A

> Large firms will be able to employ specialist managers to take care of different areas of the business. These specialist managers gain expertise and experience in a specific area of the business, which usually leads to better decision-making abilities in that area.
And the number of managers a firm needs doesn’t usually depend directly upon the production scale - i.e. twice as many managers won’t be needed to produce twice as many goods. This reduces the management cost per unit.

60
Q

Internal: Financial Economies of Scale.

A

> Larger firms can often borrow money at a lower rate of interest - lending to them is seen as less risky by banks.

61
Q

Internal: Risk-bearing Economies of Scale.

A

> Larger firms can diversify into different product areas and different markets (countries). This diversification leads to more predictable overall demand and safety if one good or country falls.
It also means large firms can take more risks as if a product is unsuccessful, a large firm’s other activities allow it to absorb the cost of failure more easily.

62
Q

Internal: Marketing Economies of Scale.

A

> Advertising is usually a fixed cost - this is spread over more units, so the cost per unit is lower.
The cost per product of advertising several products may also be lower than the cost of advertising just one, i.e. several products advertised on a single flyer.
Larger firms may also benefit from brand awareness - products will be trusted more by consumers so might mean firm doesn’t need to advertise as much to get sales.

63
Q

External economies of scale

A

> External economies of scale involve changes outside a firm.
Local colleges may start to offer qualifications needed by big local employers, reducing the firms’ training costs.
Large companies locating in an area may lead to improvements in road networks or local public transport.
If lots of firms doing similar or related things they may be able to share resources and suppliers may also decide to locate in same area, reducing transport costs.

64
Q

What can extremely successful companies gain?

A

> Monopoly power in a market.

65
Q

Economies of sales - main advantage

A

> As a firm’s AC for making a product falls, it can sell that product at a lower price, undercutting its competition.
This can lead to a firm gaining a bigger and bigger market share, as it continually offers products at a lower price than its’ competition.
In this way, a firm can eventually force its competitors out of business and become the only supplier of the product - i.e. it will have a monopoly.

66
Q

Diseconomies of scale

A

> The disadvantages of being big.
Getting bigger isn’t always good - as a firm increases in size, it can encounter diseconomies of scale.
Diseconomies of scale cause AC to rise as output rises.
They can be internal or external.

67
Q

Internal diseconomies of scale

A
  1. Wastage and loss can increases, as materials might seem in plentiful supply. Things may get lost of mislaid easier.
  2. Communication may become more difficult as a firm grows, affecting staff morale.
  3. Managers may be less able to control what goes on.
  4. Becomes more difficult to coordinate activities between different departments/divisions.
  5. A ‘them and us’ attitude can develop between workers in different parts of a large firm - workers might put their department’s interests before the company’s, leading to less cooperation and lower efficiency.
68
Q

External diseconomies of scale.

A
  1. As a whole industry becomes bigger, the price of raw materials may increase (since demand will be greater).
  2. Buying larger amounts of materials may not make them less expensive per unit. If local supplies aren’t sufficient, more expensive goods from further afield may have to be bought.
69
Q

How can economies of scales be made even larger?

A

> There are huge economies of scale in industries with high fixed costs and low variable costs.
In some cases, the structure of whole industries can change to take advantage of this.

70
Q

What do you need to use to show economies and diseconomies of scale?

A

> Long run average cost curves.

71
Q

SRAC (short run average cost) curve and LRAC (long run average cost) curve.

A

> In the short run a firm has at least one fixed factor of production, meaning it operates on a particular SRAC curve.
As a firm increases output in the short run by increasing variable factors of production, it moves along its SRAC curve.
In the long run a firm can change all factors of production. When it does this it moves onto a new SRAC curve.
The minimum possible average cost at each level of output is shown by a long run average cost curve (LRAC curve).
SRAC curves can touch the LRAC curves but can’t go below it.
For a firm to operate on its LRAC curve at a particular level of output, it has to be using the most appropriate mix of all FoPs.
This means that it may not be able to reduce costs to this minimum level in the short run (since some factors are fixed).
But in the long run a firm can vary all factors of production and bring costs down to the level of the LRAC curve.

72
Q

The shape of the LRAC curve

A

> The shape of the LRAC curve is determined by internal economies and diseconomies of scale.
AC falls as output increases when a firm is experiencing internal economies of scale.
AC rises as output increases when a firm is experiencing internal diseconomies of scale.
Firms may face specific economies and diseconomies of scale at the same output level - whether the firm is experiencing economies or diseconomies overall will depend on which is having the greater effect.

73
Q

External changes and the LRAC curves

A

> External economies of scale will the the LRAC curve to shift downwards by reducing average costs at all output levels.
External diseconomies of scale will force the LRAC curve to shift upwards.
A change in taxation might cause the LRAC curve to shift up or down.
New technology could cause the LRAC curve to shift down if it means firms can use factors of production more efficiently as all levels, e.g. faster computers for workers.

74
Q

L-Shaped LRAC Curve

A

> Some economists argue that the LRAC curve is L-shaped.
They claim average costs fall sharply as output increases, and then either continue to fall slowly or level off.
This is based on the idea that while some internal diseconomies of scale will occur with increasing output (e.g. managerial diseconomies of scale) they’ll be offset by continued reductions in AC due to things like production and technical economies of scale - so the LRAC won’t begin to curve upwards.

75
Q

Diseconomies of scale - definition

A

> A firm is experiencing diseconomies of scale when the average cost of production is rising as output rises.

76
Q

Returns to Scale - definition

A

> How much a firm’s output changes as they increase input (i.e. increase all factors of production).
Returns to scale are increasing if output increases more than proportionally with input, constant if output increases proportionally with input, and decreasing if output increases less than proportionally with input.

77
Q

Returns to Scale info

A

> Returns to scale describe the effects of increasing the scale of production.
In the long run firms can increase all of their factor inputs.
Returns to scale describe the effect on output of increasing all factor inputs by the same proportion.

78
Q

Returns to scale vs economies of scale

A

> Not the same thing.
Returns to scale describe how much output changes as input is increased.
Economies of scale describe reductions in average costs as output is increased.

79
Q

Link between returns to scale and economies of scale

A

> Increasing returns to scale contribute to economies of scale.
Decreasing returns to scale contribute to diseconomies of scale.

80
Q

Increasing returns to scale

A

> When returns to scale are increasing, long run average cost will fall.
An increase in input leads to a more than proportional increase in output, so more output is being produced per unit input.

81
Q

Constant returns to scale

A

> When returns to scale are constant, long run average cost will stay the same - costs are increasing proportionally to output.

82
Q

Decreasing returns to scale

A

> When returns to scale are decreasing, long run average cost will rise.
Less output is produced per unit of input.

83
Q

MES - definition

A

> Minimum Efficient Scale of Production.

>The lowest level of output at which a firm can achieve the lowest possible average cost of production.

84
Q

When are LRACs minimised?

A

> At the point of MES.

85
Q

MES - info

A

> The minimum efficient scale of production is the lowest level of output at which the minimum possible average cost can be achieved - it’s the first point at which the LRAC curve reaches its minimum value.
This is likely to be the optimal level of production.
There might be a range of production levels where LRAC is minimised, or the MES might be the only LRAC minimising level.

86
Q

How does the MES vary?

A

> The MES varies between industries - industries with very high fixed costs (e.g. oil extraction) have a very large MES.
This affects the whole structure of an industry - industries with a large MES will favour large firms more.

87
Q

Total revenue - definition

A

> Total revenue (TR) is the total amount of money received, in a time period, from a firm’s sales.
TR = Q x P, where Q is quantity sold and P is the price.

88
Q

Average revenue - definition

A

> Average revenue (AR) is the revenue per unit sold.
AR = TR/Q.
So AR is the price.

89
Q

Marginal revenue - definition

A

> Marginal revenue (MR) is the extra revenue received as a result of selling the final unit of output.
It is the difference between TR at the new sales level and TR at one unit less.
MR = TR(n) - TR(n-1).

90
Q

What does a firm’s demand curve determine?

A

> A firm’s demand curve determines how revenue relates to output.
Demand curves show what quantity of a product a firm will be able to sell at a particular price.
Price = average revenue, so the same curve shows the relationship between quantity sold and average revenue (so the demand curve could be labelled AR).

91
Q

Price Takers

A

> A firm that’s a price taker has no power to control the price it sells at - price takers have to accept the price set by the market.
A price taker has a perfectly elastic demand curve (i.e. it’s flat).
If the firm increases the price then quantity sold will drop to zero and there’s no reason to decrease the price because the same quantity would sell at the original higher price.

92
Q

Perfectly elastic demand curve

A

> When demand is perfectly elastic the price is the same, no matter what the output level.
In this case marginal revenue = average revenue, because each extra unit sold brings in the same revenue as all the others.
When the AR is constant, the total revenue increases proportionally with sales.

93
Q

Price makers

A

> Price makers (e.g. monopolists) have some power to set the price they sell at.
A price maker’s demand curve will slope downwards - to increase sales the firm must reduce the price.

94
Q

Downward sloping demand curves

A

> If a firm’s demand curve is a straight line sloping downwards then PED will change depending on where the firm is operating on the curve.
With a downward sloping demand curve, total revenue is maximised when the firm is operating at the midpoint of the demand curve - when PED = -1.

95
Q

Why is TR maximised when PED = - 1?

A

> At the midpoint of a downward sloping demand curve, PED = -1.
To the left of the midpoint, demand is elastic, so decreasing a product’s price towards the midpoint will cause a more than proportionate increase in sales and total revenue will increase.
To the right of the midpoint, demand is inelastic, so decreasing a product’s price below the price at the midpoint will cause a less than proportionate increase in sales and total revenue will decrease.
TR is maximised when the firm is operating at the midpoint of the demand curve - when the PED = -1.

96
Q

Relationship between MR, AR and TR

A

> The demand curve is also the AR curve.
So the maximum total revenue occurs at the midpoint of the AR curve.
The MR curve is twice as steep as the AR curve.
When TR is at its maximum, MR=0.
At the point where additional sales reduce total revenue, MR becomes negative.

97
Q

Profit - definition

A

> Profit is the difference between total revenue and total costs.
There are 2 types: normal and supernormal (abnormal) profit.
Profit = TR -TC.

98
Q

Normal Profit

A

> A firm is making normal profit when its TR = TC.
So normal profit is an ‘economic profit’ of 0.
This means normal profit occurs when the extra revenue left, on top of what’s needed to cover the firm’s money costs, is equal to the opportunity costs of the factors of production that aren’t paid for.
If the extra revenue is less than those opportunity costs, then the firm would have been better off putting the FoPs to a different use,
Normal profit is the minimum level of profit needed to keep resources in their current use in the long run.

99
Q

Supernormal profit

A

> Supernormal profit occurs when TR > TC.
A firm is making supernormal profit when its total revenue is greater than its total costs.
This means the revenue generated from using the factors of production in this way is greater than could have been generated by using them in any other way.
If firms in an industry are making supernormal profit, this will create an incentive for other firms to try to enter that industry.

100
Q

Why does a firm need normal profit in the long run?

A

> A firm needs normal profit to keep operating in the long run.
If a firm can’t make normal profit it will close in the long run, because its revenue isn’t covering all of its costs.
Even if it’s making a money profit, the FoPs could be used to better effect elsewhere.
In the long run the firm can be released from its fixed costs (e.g. by no longer renting a factory) and it will shut down.
If the price falls below the firm’s variable costs it should cease production immediately.

101
Q

Normal profit and the short-run

A

> In the short run, a firm has fixed costs that it has to pay, whether or not it produces any output.
So a loss-making firm may not close immediately - it all depends on how its revenue compares to its variable costs.
If a firm’s TR is greater than its total variable costs, then it will continue to produce in the short term.
Any revenue generated above the firm’s variable costs can contribute towards paying its fixed costs. If the firm stops production immediately, it’ll actually be worse off.
If a firm’s TR is less than its TVCs the it’ll close immediately. If it continues to produce, it’ll actually be worse off.

102
Q

Economic assumptions about firms

A

> Economists generally assume that firms are aiming to maximise their profits.
To do this, they need to find the optimum output level at which to operate.

103
Q

When are profits maximised?

A

> When MC = MR.

>This is known as the ‘MC = MR profit-maximising rule/condition’.

104
Q

Optimum output level to maximise profits

A

> If MR is greater than MC at a particular level of output, the firm should increase output as the revenue gained by increasing output is greater than the cost of producing it so increasing output adds to profit.
If MR is less than MC, the firm should decrease output because it’s costing the firm more to produce its last unit of output than it receives in revenue so decreasing output adds to profit.
This means the profit-maximising output level occurs when MR = MC.

105
Q

Firm objectives

A

> Traditional theory of a firm is based on the assumption they are aiming to maximise profit.
In reality, there are other objectives, e.g. revenue or sales maximisation

106
Q

Maximising revenue

A

> Revenue is maximised when MR = 0.
If a firm is aiming to maximise revenue they will keep increasing output past the point where profit is maximised, as long as adding more output leads to greater revenue.

107
Q

Maximising sales

A

> A firm aiming to maximise sales will produce at an output level where AR = AC.
This is the highest level of output the firm can sustain in the long run.
If sales increased further, the firm would be making a loss.

108
Q

Long run/short run and maximising profit

A

> Maximising profit in the long run sometimes means sacrificing profit in the short run.
A firm may try to maximise sales or revenue in the short run, e.g. to increase its market share, or to gain monopoly power so that it can make supernormal profits in the long run. Or high sales might make it easier for the firm to borrow money.
Some firms may even be willing to operate at a loss in the short run in order to make a profit in the long run:
-A firm may expect revenue to increase in the future, for example, once they’ve been in the market for a while and their brand recognition increases.
-Or a firm might expect to reduce costs when they’re able to output at higher production levels (i.e. experience economies of scale), and so they may keep operating at a loss while they build up the business.
A firm’s objective may be to simply survive in the short run by achieving normal profit. Then, when its established in a market, it can try to maximise profits.

109
Q

Alternative firm objectives #2

A

> Some firms might not aim for something directly related to profit, revenue or sales. But these objectives are usually pursued while also aiming to make at least normal profit.
‘Not for profit’. (aim to ‘do good’).
High quality products.
Gain loyal customers.
Some may be interested in corporate social responsibility (CSR).

110
Q

CSR

A

> Many firms are also interested in corporate social responsibility (CSR).
This involves firms operating in a way that brings benefit to society, as well as trying yo make supernormal profit (unlike ‘not for profit’). For example:
-Try to protect environment by using sustainable resources.
-Support local businesses by using suppliers in the region.
-Choose to pay workers above the standard market rate.
A firm’s CSR policies can help it increase its profits by encouraging consumers to buy from them.

111
Q

Growing from a small to large firm

A

> In small firms, the owner often manages the company on a day-to-day basis.
As firms grow, the owners often raise finance by selling shares - the new shareholders become part owners of the firm.
But the firm will actually be run by directors, who are appointed to control the business in the shareholders’ interests.
This is known as the ‘divorce of ownership from control’ - the owners are no longer in day-to-day control.
Directors might have different objectives to the owners and employees and other stakeholders in firms may also have their own objectives and might have some level of control.

112
Q

What can the divorce of ownership from control lead to?

A

> The principal-agent problem.

113
Q

Principal-agent problem - definition

A

> This is where a principal (e.g. shareholders) pays for for an agent (e.g. a managing director) to act in their interests, but instead the agent acts in their own self-interest.

114
Q

Divorce of Ownership from Control - definition

A

> This occurs when a firm’s owners are no longer in control of the day-to-day running of the firm (e.g. because it’s run by directors).
This can lead to the principal-agent problem, where those in control act in their own self-interest, rather than the interest of the owners.

115
Q

Principal-agent problem - example

A

> E.g. a firm’s shareholders will want a firm to maximise profits to increase the value of its shares. However, if the managing director’s pay or bonus is linked to revenue or sales, then they may choose to maximise those things instead.
Directors might also be keen to grown some aspect of the firm because they enjoy running a large organisation, or because being in charge of a large firm will further their career.
Employees (another example of an agent) are likely to aim to increase their own pay or benefits ahead of aiming to make profits for the firm.

116
Q

How can owners retain control over agents?

A

> Accountability and incentives.

117
Q

Managers or directors control

A

> How much control the managers or directors of a firm have depend on how accountable they are to the owners. By holding managers or directors accountable, owners can tackle the principle-agent problem.
Shareholders can remove directors by vote if they’re not happy with them, but they often lack information that might make them do this.
Accountability means managers and directors having to justify what they’ve done in the past and explain their future plans and intentions.
Owners might also try to encourage directors to aim for profit maximisation by offering incentives which make this an attractive objective for the directors to pursue.

118
Q

Stakeholder - definition

A

> Everyone with an interest in or who is affected by the firm.

119
Q

Satisficing - definition

A

> Satisficing means trying to do just enough to satisfy important stakeholders, instead of aiming to maximise a quantity such as profit (or minimise something like costs).
It’s sometimes described as ‘aiming for an easy life’.

120
Q

Example of satisficing

A

> Rather than maximising profit, directors might aim to make ‘enough profit’ to stop shareholders getting too concerned, and paying employees ‘high enough wages’ that they don’t look elsewhere to work or threaten to go on strike (this is another example of the principal-agent problem).