2. Coding, Capacity And Duration AO3 Flashcards

1
Q

Name a limitation of Baddeley’s research

A
  • Used artificial stimulus not meaningful information
  • Study had no personal meaning to participants
  • Limited application
  • Caution when generalising to different memory tasks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the effect of meaningful information on coding

A

When processing more meaningful info people may used semantic coding even for STM tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name a limitation of Jacobs study

A
  • The research was conducted a very long time ago
  • Early research often lacks adequate control of extraneous variables
  • Results may not be valid if variables weren’t controlled
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give an example of a potential extraneous variable in Jacobs’ study

A

If participant was distracted they may not have performed as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name a strength of Jacobs research

A

Results have been confirmed by other studies supporting its validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Name a limitation of Miller’s research

A
  • He may have overestimated the capacity of STM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain a study that challenges Miller’s research

A

Researcher reviewed other research - concluded capacity of STM was about 4 chunks - suggests lower end of Miller’s estimate is more appropriate than 7 items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Name a limitation of Peterson and Peterson’s research

A
  • Artificial stimulus
  • Memorising consonant syllables doesn’t reflect real life memory activities
  • Not meaningful
  • Study could lack external validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain a counter argument for Peterson and Peterson’s research being meaningless

A

We do sometimes remember meaningless things such as phone numbers - study isn’t totally irrelevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name a strength of Bahrick’s study

A
  • High externals validity
  • Real life, meaningful memories (e.g. People’s faces)
  • When lab studies were done with meaningless pictures - recall rates were lower.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Name a counter argument for Bahrick’s study having high external validity

A

Downside of real life research:

  • Confounding variables aren’t controlled
  • E.g. Bahrick’s participants may have looked at yearbook over the years - rehearsed memories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly