Crim 101 chapter 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Define criminology

A

The study of crime and criminal behavior which are defined by reference to criminal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define criminal law

A

The entire set of principles, procedures and rules established by governments through the courts and criminal legislation in order to ensure public safety. It includes definition of crimes, criminal responsibility and punishments, and defenses to a criminal charge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define prohibition

A

A law forbidding a specific act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

All societies have developed mechanism for the collective enforcement of group norms in service of what might be called a _____ _______

A

All societies have developed mechanism for the collective enforcement of group norms in service of what might be called a public purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fun fact: Criminal behavior is addressed by state, not individual, action.

A

wow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why are crime always prosecuted by the state?

A

Crime is prosecuted by the state because it is considered to be a violation of public order rather than an infringement on the rights of citizen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are two examples of private prosecution?

A
  • The prosecution that led to the execution of the Greek philosopher Socrates in 399 BCE was initiated and conducted in large part of Meletus
  • Cicero’s prosecution of Gaius Verres for corruption was initiated on behalf of deprived Roman Citizens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in the Age of Enlightenment in 18th-century Europe?

A

A number of factors had combined to create what we now recognize as a modern system of criminal law: emergence of the government as a meaningful source of central authority and a mechanism of collective action, which supplemented and eventually displaced the Church; the growth of professional state police services; and the ever-increasing complexity of social interaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the modern system of criminal law required?

A

The modern system of criminal law required a body of penal law that was comprehensive, codified, and subject to consistent enforcement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Defined penal law

A

A law that imposes punishment as opposed to (for instance) a law that provides only the right of a victim to compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was Canada’s history of the law making and the beginning of the Criminal Code? 4 things

A
  • Criminal prohibitions in Canada were inherited in modern form along with the laws of England that began in 18th century and continued until the Statute of Westminster in 1931. (which saw the Surpreme Court of Canada become the court of last resort for criminal matters)
  • In the late 19th century, the basic elements of the criminal justice system such as police, courts, prisons and legislation were firmly in place.
  • Canada adopted its own Criminal Code in 1892. The effect of this code was to codify existing English offences
  • Canada retained the power to create common law offences until the 1950s
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define common law

A

A body of law defined primarily through successive decisions of judges as opposed to through legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When did and what act did the federal Parliament determined what acts are criminal, which available punishments apply, and the procedures associated with investigating and prosecuting crimes?

A

The federal Parliament determined them in 1867, by the terms of section 91(27) of Canada’s Constitution Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What 4 pieces of federal legislation are found about the laws that most people think of as “criminal laws” and the laws that consume virtually all of the effects of the criminal courts and corrections systems?

A
  • Criminal Code
  • Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
  • Youth Criminal Justice Act
  • Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the three criminal offences categories and what are they about?

A

Criminal offences fall into one of the three categories: summary offences, hybrid offences or indictable offences:

  • Summary offences are relatively minor offences, punishable by a fine ($5000) or a maximum jail sentence of six months.
  • Indictable offence are serious offences, such as murder or rape, which carries a severe penalty. An indictment is the formal process of setting out a criminal charge in a document for serious, “indictable” offences
  • Hybrid offences are indictable offences that result in summary convictions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is universal jurisdiction?

A

A power or law that can be applied anywhere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is one legislation that is an international criminal law, what is it about and what is one example of it being used?

A
  • The Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act is an example of an international law that assume jurisdiction over crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide and any other crime recognized under this law. This law can be used on somebody even if it took place in another country and did not involve any Canadian citizens.
  • An example of it being used is in 2009, Desire Munyaneza, a Rwandan national with permanent resident status in Canada. He was convicted under this act in Quebec for the Rwandan genocide and the court sentenced him to life imprisonment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the ICC and who refused to participate? (4 nations refused)

A

The International Criminal Court (ICC), located in The Hague in the Netherlands has more than 120 countries as members and had a mandate under the provisions of public international law to prosecute genocide and other crimes against humanity. United states, Israel, China and Russia have refused to participate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the adjudication of Canada’s criminal cases divided into? two levels of court

A

The adjudication of Canada’s criminal cases is divided between two levels of court in the provinces and territories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the differences and similarities in provincial court and differences and similarities in federal court? (6 things)

A
  • Provincial superior courts are administered by the provinces but their judges are appointed federally
  • The provincial and federal government can’t impair the courts’ fundamental powers or jurisdiction
  • Superior court is divided into a trial court (Called in BC the Surpreme Court and in Ontario the Superior Court of Justice) and a court of appeal
  • Each province has its provincial court also known as “inferior court”
  • Provincial Court judges are appointed by the provincial government and have jurisdiction over matters considered to be less important.
  • Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal deal mainly with matters of exclusively federal interest and the Surpreme Court of Canada provide final decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Draw figure 3.1

A

Check figure 3.1 on pg. 54

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Why do criminal courts apply the criminal code to the facts of a particular case?

A
  • Provides interpretation of the law

- It gives the judges some written reasons for their decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

“commentators sometimes describe the Canadian legal regime as a common law system.” Is this description correct?

A

No it is incorrect because even though judges can exercise varying degrees of discretion in their decisions, they remain constrained by legislation in the same way as judges in countries that use the continental European, or civil law, system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Define civil law

A

A system in which the law is primarily set out in legislation, and the judges’discretion is limited to interpretation and application of those written provisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

When were common law crimes abolished in the Commonwealth jurisdictions in Canada?

A

At the time of the consolidation of the Criminal Code in 1953

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is the difference in Canada criminal law and the continental European tradition? 2 things

A
  • Canada is in its complete reliance on an adversarial rather than inquisitorial, model.
  • In European countries, the judge may play a role as an active investigator while in Canada, the judge is an impartial arbiter between the state on one hand, usually represented by a public prosecutor and the individual and his/her lawyer on the other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How does the criminal justice process go? Pt. 1 Hint: Investigations to accused in custody. 6 things

A
  • A crime occurs and is investigated by the police officers
  • When the police have gathered sufficient evidence to support a charge, they then provide a report to the public prosecutor’s office who then approves the charge based on an assessment of whether the evidence will support a conviction and whether prosecution is in the public interest.
  • The prosecution begins by the swearing of an information before justice of the peace. Swearing is done by a police officer or another public official. The police officer recounts his/her belief that a crime has been committed and the justice of the peace orders the charge.
  • Private prosecutions are possible under the Code
  • The accused that has been arrested, is usually released with a promise to appear in court at an appointed time but in serious matters, the police may choose to hold the accused in custody.
  • If the Crown proceeds by way of indictment, a preliminary inquiry is held at which a judge of the Provincial Court decides whether sufficient evidence exists to proceed to trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does it mean for the prosecutor to stay charge?

A

A prosecutor may pursue or stay charges (that is, suspend or terminate the prosecution)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How does the criminal justice process go? pt.2 Hint: Charter of rights and freedoms to the end. 7 things

A
  • Under section 11 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the accused has a right to choose trial by judge and jury for any offence that could result in a sentence of 5 years or more
  • Accused may sit mute, exercising the right to silence in trial
  • A trial may result in an acquittal (after which an accused may not be retried, unless the Crown successfully appeals), a stay of proceedings (a suspension of charges) or a mistrial (where the trial is aborted but may begin anew at a later date)
  • Once convicted, an accused faces a sentence that can range from an absolute or conditional discharge (whereby an accused is forgiven for the offence) to imprisonment for periods up to life.
  • Death penalty for murder was abolished in Canada in 1976
  • Sentences of less than 2 years are served in provincial correctional institutions while 2 years or more are served in federal penitentiaries.
  • Parole system in Canada releases prisoners under supervision after they have served one-third of their sentences
30
Q

Draw figure 3.2

A

Check figure 3.2 on pg. 56

31
Q

Define indictment

A

A formal written accusation, usually reserved for more serious crimes

32
Q

What do crime described in a federal statute contain?

A

Provisions that contain a description of the prohibited act (actus reus) coupled with some element of mental culpability (mens rea)

33
Q

Define actus reus

A

The criminal act or personal conduct relating to a crime; it may include a failure to act, but does not include the mental element of a criminal offence

34
Q

Define mens rea

A

The mental element of a criminal offence or the state(s) of mind of the offender; it is the intent to commit a criminal act

35
Q

What is “guilty mind” referred as?

A

mens rea

36
Q

What is required for every serious criminal offence?

A

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt of mental culpability. In other words, the motive to commit a certain crime

37
Q

What are one of the two things that need to occur for there to be no criminal liability?

A
  • Where the prosecution fails to establish any of the elements of the offence OR
  • the defendant can disprove an element of the offence
38
Q

Define intoxication

A

A potential defense in which drugs or alcohol may prevent an accused from forming the necessary intent to commit a particular crime

39
Q

What is an example of a partial defense to cast doubt into the prosecution’s proof?

A

Intoxication

40
Q

Define true defense and what are two examples of it?

A

True defense is a set of circumstances that, if proven by the accused, will excuse him or her of the crime. An example of it is the defense of insanity and another would be Section 34 of the Criminal Code, for example, provides that a person is not guilty of a crime, if he/she acts reasonably in his or her own defense or the defense of another

41
Q

Define duress

A

An unlawful threat or coercion used by one person to induce another to perform some act against his/her will. In other words, a person is forced to perform some act under the threat of death or serious injury.

42
Q

What is one example of a common law defense?

A

The defense of duress

43
Q

What are 5 of the many crimes in Canada?

A
  • Incest
  • Possession offences
  • Dangerous driving and other forms of recklessness can be criminal even if no accident results
  • Publishing an advertisement offering a reward for the recovery of a lost or stolen item and promising “no questions asked”
  • Polygamy (being in a marriage with more than one person at a time)
44
Q

What are 3 criminal acts that will increase the risk of social harm in society?

A
  • The large amount of high-capacity pistol magazines or burglary tools will increase the risk of mass shootings or breaking-and-entering incidents
  • Incest increases the risk that girls will be targeted and groomed as sexual partners by male household members
  • “no question asked” reward posters create a marketplace for stolen goods and therefore increase the risk of thefts
45
Q

What are the most 3 frequently cited justifications for criminal penalties and define all 3?

A

The most 3 frequently cited justifications for criminal penalties are deterrence, denunciation and retribution.

  • Deterrence is a principle of sentencing or punishment intended to discourage citizens from offending or reoffending
  • Denunciation is a formal expression that conduct is unacceptable
  • Retribution is a punishment for transgression (crime)
46
Q

How is denunciation and retribution considered as social goods? 2 reasons

A
  • They increases humans’ sense of positive well-being
  • They are pleasurable as transgressors are punished because doing so provided positive benefits to the group and its individual members through the elimination of group-diminishing behavior.
47
Q

What is specific deterrence and general deterrence?

A

Specific deterrence is when the punishment or principle of sentencing is to discourage offenders from reoffending. General deterrence is when others discourage from offending by learning from the punishment of another.

48
Q

What is one example of deterrence?

A

When Canada introduced a criminal prohibition on the possession of an unregistered firearm and coupled it with significant penalties for non-compliance, must gun owners registered their weapons or disposed of them. Thus the targeted activity (possession of an unregistered firearm) was deterred.

49
Q

What does criminal law provide and what does constitutional law do?

A

Criminal law provides crude coercive weight to the will of the majority and constitutional law restrains government and enforces individual rights

50
Q

Any successful society exists in a tension between what and what? What is its borderline?

A

Any successful society exists in a tension between the liberty of individuals and the power of the state. The borderline between this is an individual fulfillment and freedom in life while subject to limitations in the interest of the collective good.

51
Q

What occurred after the Norman Conquest of 1066? 5 things

A
  • In England after the Norman Conquest of 1066, the series of revolutions, compromises and agreements, led to a representative Parliament.
  • Crown’s power was diminished through the recognition of fundamental rights of citizens faced with criminal accusations
  • Magna Carta (“great charter”) in 2015 began to refer to the inalienable right of individuals to a minimum standard of due process
  • Parliamentary supremacy hold and transfer the power from the king to the Parliament.
  • It did not stop the abuse of authorities
52
Q

Define parliamentary supremacy

A

The concept that the legislative body is superior to other institutions, including the executive and the courts

53
Q

Define rule of law

A

The principle that governments, individuals, and corporations must follow the law; government may take actions that limit the activities or rights of citizens only in accordance with substantive and procedural requirements prescribed by law.

54
Q

What is the “Bills of Attainder” and “Bills of Pains and Penalties” do and who passed them?

A

They are passed by the English Parliament to effectively convict and punish named individuals

55
Q

Define habeas corpus and what did the English right of habeas corpus do?

A

Habeas corpus is the right of an accused to appear before a court and not be detained without just cause. This right permits a prisoner to challenge the lawfulness of his/her confinement.

56
Q

What was one of the forces that drove the development of constitutionalism?

A

Popular demand to establish fundamental rights in the law is one of the forces that drove the development of constitutionalism

57
Q

What established the idea that the power of the collective and the state must be balanced against the rights of the individual?

A

The Bill of Rights in the US Constitution

58
Q

The _____ of _____ and ______ grants a number of rights to criminal defendants.

A

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms grants a number of rights to criminal defendants

59
Q

As the law progressed. other vulnerable minorities were also recognized as worthy of legal protection. What was the order of when they became worth of protection?

A
  1. First, members of political and religious groups

2. Disadvantaged race as well as women

60
Q

What has strongly influenced the development of criminal law in Canada and elsewhere?

A

Efforts to build a more just and equal society

61
Q

What is three examples of rights that have limits to them?

A
  • The right of free speech is an example. It is protected in all communications except those that are immediately harmful (such as in the US Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ favorite example of shouting “fire” in a crowded theater.
  • Art and literature that has been deemed “obscene” was made criminal
  • Canada introduction on prohibitions on hate speech such as the advocacy of genocide
62
Q

What is political affiliation used for?

A

used for a ground of imprisonment

63
Q

What is a main difficulty in setting limits on criminal law? What is an example of it

A

A main difficulty in setting limits on criminal law is determining when a law serves legitimate social purpose or instead if simply the handmaiden of an outdated paternalism or empty morality. An example is the criminal law against homosexual sodomy

64
Q

Define interjurisdictional and what are 3 examples of it?

A

Interjurisdictional relates to crimes, legislation or other legal issues that cross the boundaries of nations, provinces or other jurisdictions. Examples include:

  1. Child exploitation
  2. Security fraud
  3. Environmental crimes
65
Q

Fun fact: criminal law is the product of humans and, like them, it is brilliant and inevitably deeply flawed

A

wow

66
Q

It is impossible to understand criminal law without an understanding of its ….? 4 things

A

It is possible to understand criminal law without an understanding of its historical, sociological, political, and psychological context

67
Q

What is the Criminal Code for hate speech?

A

“Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
A) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
B) an offence punishable on summary conviction

68
Q

What happened in the incident with James Keegstra? 5 things

A
  • Keegstra was an anti-Semitic high school teacher
  • He taught that Jewish were responsible for the depressions, chaos and wars
  • He said the Jews “created the Holocaust to gain sympathy”
  • He expected his students to accept and reproduce his teachings or they be given a poor grade
  • Keegstra argued that everyone has the freedom of thought and belief but the government arrested him and said that the hate speech laws are designed to protect the rights of victims as well as important public values.
69
Q

?% is defendants found guilty

A

60% is defendants found guilty

70
Q

What are the three most common sentences? Order maters

A
  1. Probation
  2. Custody
  3. Fine
71
Q

What are 3 Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

A
  1. Everyone has the right to life, freedom,and liberty and the right to not be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice
  2. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure
  3. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisonment