Critical concepts Flashcards
affective fallacy and intentional fallacy
coined by Wimsatt and Beardsley in ‘The Verbal Icon’
- the common error in poetry criticism were you focus too much on your own feelings when reading the poem, than the text itself and analysing how it works.
- of course a poem cannot be totally seperated from a reader’s response, but the focus should be with the text
- the error of interpreting a text in the light of what you believe to be the author’s aim
- misleading as it diverts attention away from the text itself, and moved to external matters such as the author’s personal life or state of mind
- you have to concentrate on the work itself and discuss the effect rather than identifying the author’s intention
allegory
a work which has a meaning behind the surface meaning (e.g. you can read the surface story of a hero’s adventures, but the text can have a general significance as an allegory of Christian’s journey through life/….)
- most medieval literature is allegorical, underlying meaning being religious (because an allegory always shows the everyday world as an imperfect reflection of the divine world and so there is always an awareness of a deeper meaning behind the superficial world)
- allegorical story in prose/poetry/medieval morality plays often a quest narrative of someone’s journey through life as a mythic story works well to talk about universal facts and forces
- although we are aware of the underlying religious order, our focus is on the challenges of the hero/heroine indicating the gap between reality/divine world
- 17th C Western Europe: allegorical way of thinking gone through shift towards more secular world. Allegory became a way of perceiving life and a mode writers employed (and not about the gap anymore religious/secular, think about Animal Farm)
allusion
a passing reference to a person, place or event beyond the obvious subject matter of a text
OR
a reference within a text to another literary work
(e.g. love poem that includes a phrase from Shakespeare’s Othello to enhance or complicate a text)
difference between allegory and symbolism
- allegory: fixed meaning behind the surface meaning and we are sure what the precise meaning is as we are meant to see the underlying meaning through the text
- symbolism: elusive meaning behind the surface meaning and cannot be translated into other terms
intertextuality
deliberate quoting from or parodying other texts
similar to allusion, but more explicit so that we become aware of the textuality of the work, of its status as fiction
plays with the notion of new work replacing the old, how texts draw upon other texts to reorder the old menaings or invent new ones
ambiguity
when words have several meanings, they become ambiguous and make us uncertain what is meant
central in poetry as different views can be taken of what certain words mean in a poem, and poetry deals with this exact complexity of experience as a theme
reductive, simple interpretation of a poem has to make room for language full of conflicting, ambiguous meanings
aporia
a term taken from Greek rhetoric
traditionally used as a figure of speech in which a speaker or character deliberates on an irresolvable question
(e.g. Hamlet’s to be or not to be)
deconstructive critics also view it aporia as a point where we are faced with the gap between what a text wishes to say and what it is constrained to say (focus on indeterminacy of language always being in flow)
archetype
a basic model from which copies are made
typical archetypes:
- a story of death and rebirth
- a story of a journey through life
- a story that deals with a search for the father
being aware of archetypical patterns:
- it helps us to see the informing concerns of literature, how similar problems are to return again and again
- if we are aware of the pattern, we can then look at how individual writers add to the basic pattern in order to make their work different
binary opposition
refers to two mutually exclusive terms such as left/right, man/women, nature/culture
structuralists: argue that these oppositions are basic to all cultural phenomena, but that meaning itself also functions this way (i.e. we only know the meaning of the word ‘left’ through its contrast with the word ‘right’)
+ the oppositions are hierarchal (men above women) which feminist critic has deconstructed!
><
deconstructionist critics: meaning is not oppositional, terms like nature and culture are not external from each other, pure or single. There’s always a trace of the other term in them.
They emphasise the plurality of differences (// ambiguity) and undo binary oppositions.
(e.g. struggle between Romans and Goths in story = structuralists say there is an opposition between Roman nobility vs. Gothic Barbarity – deconstructionists points out the way in which these invade each other and how each show traces of the other so that there is no difference between nobility and barbarity anymore)
canon
- originally refers to the list of books in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament which were accepteed by church authorities as genuine and having divine authority
- books outside the canon are called apocrypha
- difference between Protestant and Catholic churches as to which writings are apocryphal
- literature two meanings
- narrow: apply it to works (e.g. Shakespeare canon, which means a canon consisting of those works accepted as genuinly written by Shakespeare)
- wider: those authors who by tradition or consensus are considered as major or great, ‘the classics’
- F.R. Leavis, Cambridge critic who restricted canon to four authors, major influence on British uni
- 1970s modern critical theory, feminist and poststructuralist criticism = canon reflected and reinforced a certain view of culture and society (male, white, educated, heterosexual, European)
- led to several alternative canons (womens, black, gay canons), widening of the canon itself so that it becomes an ever changing, unfixed body, universities mix up there authors too
dialogic and polyphonic
dialogic: utterances that imply a situation of dialogue or are directed to a listener
polyphonic: made up of several voices, whenever we speak we use words and phrases from other conversations; carrying traces from it
(Bakhtin argues that all utterances are both)
contradiction
occurs when we are faced with two or more meanings that cannot be reconciled or resolved
(different from ambiguity in that ambiguity denotes the richness of the texts, contradiction points to incoherences or divisions in a text creating instability)
contradiction often used when looking at the politics or ideology of a text (e.g. Jane Eyre is a contradictory text as it both challenges and supports contemporary social ideas about gender and class)
Derrida’s deconstructionalist thought
he sees a constant sliding between meanings and a plurality of differences in which opposites have traces of each other
(// Saussure with signified/signifié (actual tree) and signifier/signifiant (word used to refer to that tree: boom, tree, un arbre, etc.)
convention
a literary convention is a feature of a text which is found in a large number of texts
(e.g. there are many poems written in sonnet form, thus a sonnet is a conventional form of poetry - length is conventional, conventions of change of direction occurs in a sonnet, rhyme scheme of sonnet has one of two conventional patterns, subject matter often conventional, etc.)
conventions of form and subject are found in all literary work, but interesting is how an author makes his work distinctive within these conventions
didactic
a work dealing with a moral, religious or political theme
(most of medieval literature is therefore didactic because it attemts to explain the mysteries of Christianity)
empathy and sympathy
- empathy: means ‘feeling into’, becoming totally absorbed in and physically participating in an object
- sympathy: means ‘feeling with’ the emotions and state of mind of a character in a play (e.g. through a soliloquy were the hero adresses us alone on stage)
- when reading a play or novel we often find ourselves sympathetically involved with the characters, whilst maintaining a degree of critical detachment
form and content
content is what is said in a literary work
form is how/the way in which it is said
formal analysis = discuss the relationship between the content and its form, these are inseperable and talking about the overall structure and the imagery used is only useful when linked back to the content and how it adds to that.