2: Private Equity Flashcards

0
Q

Bailey’s criteria for an appropriate investment benchmark

A
Unambiguous
Investible
Measurable
Specified in advance
Appropriate (for what is being measured)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

RPVI (residual value to paid in ratio)

A

Measures how much of investor’s capital is still tied up in the fund.
RPVI = NAV / paid-in capital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

TOPSCAN framework

A
Team building
Operations
Perspective
Skill building
Customer development
Analysis
Network
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key performance drivers for PE

A

Selection of fund manager
Management of diversification
Management of capital commitments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the resources that VCs should assess in terms of their value proposition?

A
  • Brand resources
  • Cash resources
  • In house expertise
  • Network resources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Benefits of FoF investing (4)

A

Diversification and intermediation
Resources and information
Selection skills and expertise
Incentives, oversight and agreements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hurt money

A

GP’s contribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Type 1 conflict

A

Conflict between firm’s and client’s interests. Mitigated by aligning interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Type 2 conflict

A

Firm favors one client to detriment of another. Worse than type 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Steps of PE investment process (6)

A
Portfolio objectives 
Portfolio design 
Liquidity management (over commit) 
Fund selection 
Monitoring
Actions and implementation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bottom up

A

Find best manager

Drawback: can result in unbalanced/risky portfolio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Top down

A

Focus on sector or strategy

Drawback: strict allocations may be impractical to attain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Advantages of core satellite

A

Diversification
Customization
Target risks
Focus on satellite portfolios

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Effects of diversification

A

Lowers risk, return, skew and kurtosis

20-30 funds diversifies 80% of SD; 5 funds diversify 80% of K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Market timing

A

Predict vintage years that will perform well

Issues: PE markets over react to news

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cost averaging

A

Invest consistently in each fund type each vintage year (ie vintage year diversification)

16
Q

Fund manager selection process

A

Wish list
Deal sourcing
DD
Decision and commitment

17
Q

Drawback of IIRR

A

Assumes distributions reinvested at IIRR. Solution is to use modified IRR as it assumes a different investment rate and accounts for cost of capital

18
Q

Drawbacks of paid in ratios

A

Ignore TVM and requires estimates of NAV

19
Q

Potential actions for poorly performing funds

A
Do not commit to follow on funds
Negotiate for change
Petition for lower management fees
Threaten action against or terminate managers
Investor default
20
Q

Pro for using NAV

A

Investors prefer valuation based on current (not future) information

21
Q

Cons for NAV

A

Private funds cannot be divided up into underlying portfolio companies
Aggregate NAV does not reflect economic value

22
Q

NAV does not reflect economic value. why?

A
It doesn't account for:
Undrawn commitments 
Value add provided by managers
Future fund expenses 
Capital constraints
23
Q

Shortcomings of CAPM

A
Assumes the following:
No transaction costs
Fully informed buyers and sellers
Tradable assets 
Markets always in equilibrium
24
Q

4 methods of estimating PE betas

A

1: Estimation based on quoted comps
2: Relative risk measures
3: bottom up beta
4: beta based on data corrected for staleness and smoothing (not recommended)

25
Q

Why is bottom up beta better than simple regression

A

1: averaging regression betas reduces noise
2: estimates reflect current fund
3: leveraged betas calculated using current leverage

Drawbacks: difficult to find quoted comps and assumptions needed for future cash flows

26
Q

Sources of funding/liquidity for PE investors

A

1: follow on funding
2: liquidity lines
3: maturing treasury investments
4: realizations of other investments
5: sell off LP shares
6: distributions from PE fund
7: LP default

27
Q

Estimation (CF projections)

A

Short term (3-6m)
Based on current market conditions
Data gathering and analysis

28
Q

Forecasting (CF)

A
Medium term (1-2y)
Based on specific market environment 
Quantitative (ie regression) modeling
29
Q

Scenarios (CF)

A
Long term (2+yrs)
Based on uncertain market environment
30
Q

Automatic conversion

A

Pref stock automatically converted (based on trigger price) to common stock at IPO, if IPO price is high enough
Higher automatic conversion hurdles better for investors

31
Q

Bad leaver clause

A
  • enables removal of GP with a simple majority vote (for cause)
  • suspends investments until replacement is found
  • in extreme situations, fund can be liquidated

Sidey: In contrast to good leaver clauses, bad leaver clauses provide no entitlement to carried interest, but provide a vesting schedule so that part of the carried interest remains available as an incentive for the new manager

33
Q

Good leaver clause

A
  • “without cause” removal; allows LPs with a qualified majority (a vote of more than 75%) to stop funding a partnership
  • enables LP to end a failing partnership and is especially important for funds that do not have a track record
  • sometimes provide compensation in the form of management fees for a period of time
34
Q

Traditional asset allocation techniques should not be used in private equity markets because:

A
  1. there are issues with private equity data (such as scarcity of data and exposure to survivorship bias),
  2. non-normality of private equity data, and
  3. the implicit correlation that exists between private equity data and public equity data.