3 Logical Positivism in psychology 2 Flashcards

1
Q

According to the Verification Principle, sentences are meaningful if they are in principle capable of being verified by observational tests.
This verification involves…

A

Describing a way of verifying the statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Bridgman (1927) define operationalism?

A

“The meaning of a concept is synonymous with a set of operations necessary to measure or manipulate that concept”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do operational definitions confuse the role of causality in manipulating variables?

A

If the variable (e.g. guilt) is defined operationally, then it is CAUSED by manipulation by experimenters. A variable cannot BE something AND be caused by it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does operationism lead to proliferation of definitions?

A

Because each researcher will operationalise a variable differently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does operationism encourage the abandonment of some of psychology’s most interesting concepts?

A

Notions such as hope, ambition etc. are jetissoned because they don’t denote anything directly observable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In what way is operationism anthropocentric?

A

What COULD be known is reduced to what the researcher does. The concept may have nothing to do with what researcher does.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What logical error undermines operationism?

A

Operationism, like verificationism, involves the logical error of identifying the concept with the means by which that concept is to be identified.

It denies the distinction between phenomenon of, say, guilt (the ontology) and the means by which we can come to learn about that phenomenon through measuring (epistemology) it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the classical (Socratic) account of a definition?

A

A description of the thing being defined, whereby every constituent or characteristic will be a feature of the thing being defined.

e.g. a definition of the word kangaroo sets out the characteristics which an object must have to be included in the class ‘kangaroo’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the ‘intension’ of the term ‘kangaroo’?

A

The characteristics necessary and sufficient for membership of the class of kangaroo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is ‘division’?

A

Providing examples of a thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the ‘extension’ of the term ‘kangaroo’?

A

Instances of kangaroos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is a kangaroo NOT a kangaroo?

A

In those cases when it is not a kangaroo, yet still a kangaroo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly