Week 3: Anderson, Potocnik & Zhou (2014) Innovation and creativity in organisations: A state of the science review, prospective commentary and guiding framework Flashcards Preview

Leadership and Management > Week 3: Anderson, Potocnik & Zhou (2014) Innovation and creativity in organisations: A state of the science review, prospective commentary and guiding framework > Flashcards

Flashcards in Week 3: Anderson, Potocnik & Zhou (2014) Innovation and creativity in organisations: A state of the science review, prospective commentary and guiding framework Deck (16)
Loading flashcards...
1
Q

The purpose of Andersons et al. (2014) article is to review prior literature on organisational behaviour and creativity/innovation on four levels. What are those levels?

They call that framework how?

A

individual
team
organisational
multilevel

the four-levels-of-analysis framework

2
Q

Anderson et al. identify six influential theoretical perspectives across the literature about creativity and innovation.

What are the main perspectives they identify?

A
  1. componential theory of organisational creativity and innovation
  2. interactionist perspectives of organisational creativity
  3. model of individual creative action
  4. theorising on cultural differences and creativity
  5. four-factor theory of team climates for innovation
  6. ambidexterity theory
3
Q

The componential theory of organisational creativity and innovation argues what?

A

that work environments have an impact on creativity

4
Q

The interactionist perspectives of organisational creativity argues what?

A

creativity is a complex interaction between the individual and its work situation at different levels

5
Q

the model of individual creative action argues what?

A

employees have to choose between two options: either to be involved in creative work or to be involved in routine and habitual work

6
Q

The model of individual creative action argues that three factors influence the decision between whether someone would rather engage in habits/routine or creativity/innovation.

What are those factors?

A

sense making process, motivation, knowledge/skill

7
Q

Theories on cultural differences in creativity argue what?

A

that there are significant implications that differences in creativity can stem from cultural differences

8
Q

The four-factor theory of team climate for innovation argues what?

A

that four factors facilitate innovation:

vision, participative safety, task orientation, support for innovation

9
Q

The ambidexterity theory of creativity argues what?

A

that successful innovation comes from a process of managing conflicting demands at multiple organisational levels by engaging in fundamentally different activities

10
Q

The individual level of creative analysis concerns what? Name four examples.

A

traits, goal orientations, values, identity

11
Q

The team level of analysis concerns itself with what? Name three examples.

A

team structure, climate and leadership

12
Q

The organisational level of analysis concerns itself with what? Name four examples.

A

structure, strategy, size, resources

13
Q

The multilevel analysis can be described as what?

A

team level + individual innovation

14
Q

Anderson et al. argue that there are notable shortcomings in the creativity/innovation research field due to what reason?

A

the research is tortured by too many diverse approaches with a lack of integration of them

15
Q

The authors argue that creativity and innovation allows firms to ____ and ____.

A

survive and prosper

16
Q

What do the authors suggest for future research?

A

they left 11 major themes and 60 specific questions for future research

Decks in Leadership and Management Class (28):