Renal cell Flashcards

1
Q

pathophysiology -3

A

80-85% of kidney tumors are renal cell:

  • 75-85% clear cell
  • 12-14% chromophilic
  • 4-6% chromophobic
  • others

15-20% transitional cell

wilm’s tumor (kids)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Von Hippel-Lindau gene -3

A

tumor suppressor gene

deletion in short arm of chromosome 3p

regulates HIF (hypoxic inducable factor) which controls angiogenic processes VEGF and PDGF (goes unchecked with mutation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

pathogenesis (3pts)

A

classic is Von Hippel-Lindau dz

others genetic abnormalities also

multiple (more than 1) genetic abnormalities associated with poor outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

treatment of T1 and T2 (confined to renal parenchyma) -3

WHAT IS TOC?

CAN YOU CURE?

A

SURGERY ONLY (NEOADJ IS NOT GIVEN)

radical nephrectomy cures >80% of time,

only surgery curative,

not preferred but can do partial nephrectomy in pts for whom radical would result in permanent dialysis OR if contralateral kidney is threatened by a second disease (DM, HTN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what % present with metastatic dz? -1

A

20%, incurable but may also do radical nephectomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what % of tumors occur bilaterally? -1

A

1-3%, poor outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

treatment of T1 and T2 (confined to renal parenchyma) - partial nephrectomy + adjuvant -1

A

IFN-alpha WORSE than placebo: median OS 5.1 vs 7.4yrs

DO NOT GIVE IN EARLY STAGE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MSKCC risk factors (5pts)

IMPORTANT FOR PROGNOSIS

IMPORTANT FOR TRIAL DESIGN

A

KPS 10

high LDH >300

time from dx to systemic tx 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

prognosis by MSKCC risk factor (3pts)

A

median OS with IFN-alpha

0: 30mo

1-2: 14mo

3-5: 5mo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

stage IV: summary of cytokine data -6

A

IFN-alpha and IL-2 have ~ same RR, BUT IL-2 has more “durable” (5,6,7 yr) responses

reserve IL-2 for young with good organ function and good PS because of tox

high dose IL-2 preferred (similar to melanoma)

combo increased RR but NOT OS

removal of primary tumor followed by IFN may inc RR (not true adjuvant b/c still have met dz in rest of body)

most trials use IFN as control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

mTOR pathway (3pts)

A

leads to biosynthesis of HIF (similar to VHL) -> VEGF and PDGF

mTOR lies downstream of PI3K

CONTROLS CELL REGULATION PROCESS by regulates cell growth and cell proliferation (G1 to S phase)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

sorafenib - 2

DO YOU USE 1ST OR 2ND LINE?

A

approved for 2nd line use after IFN

RR 10 vs 2 (sig)

TTP 5.5 vs 2.8 (sig)

OS: 17.8 vs 15.2 (NS)

IN front line setting vs IFN did not show PFS benefit, because of this is 2nd line option

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sorafenib dose and food issues

A

400mg bid WITHOUT food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sunitinib dose and ADR -5

OS 26.4 vs 21.8 (p=0.051)

DO YOU USE 1ST OR 2ND LINE?

A

APPROVED FOR 1ST LINE OR 2ND LINE

50mg daily x4wks, THEN 2 weeks OFF

rash, 
HFS, 
dry skin, 
HTN, 
diarrhea
less common: 
neutrop, 
hepatotox, 
dec LVEF, 
prolonged QT, 
hemorrhagic events

other anti-VEGF ae (proteinuria, wound healing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

pazopanib dose and food issues

A

800mg daily WITHOUT food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

pazopanib -4

DO YOU USE 1ST OR 2ND LINE?

A

approved for 1st or 2nd line use

PFS 9.2 vs 4.2 mo with IFN

ALT elevations seen

approved 1st line

17
Q

pazopanib vs sunitinib -2

WHAT IS PREFERRED AND WHY?

A

PFS 8.4 vs 9.5 (NS)

lower rate of fatigue and HFS and inc QOL with pazo

18
Q

axitinib dose and ADR -4

A

5mg bid

rare ADR: RPLS

other ADR: 
hypothyroidism, 
hepatotox, 
HTN, 
hemorrhagic, 

vegf ae’s

19
Q

axitinib vs sorafenib IN 2ND LINE -2

WHAT IS PREFERRED AND WHY?

A

A approved for 2nd line use after IFN

A superior to S in 2nd line setting

RR 19 vs 9

PFS 6.7 vs 4.7mo

20
Q

everolimus for pts progressing after sorafenib and/or sunitinib -5

DO YOU USE 1ST OR 2ND LINE? after what tx?

A

approved for 2nd line use after TKI’s (OR THIRD LINE)

oral mTOR inhibitor

improved PFS 4.9 vs 1.9 mo

mostly stable dz

No OS benefit

21
Q

everolimus dose, DA, DDI -3

A

10mg daily, 28d cycles

reduce to 5mg if Child-Pugh class B hepatic impairment

CYP3A4 substrate (may inc in 5mg increments to 20md daily if on strong inducer)

22
Q

everolimus ADR -3

REMEMBER PRIMARY CARE ISSUES

A

common: stomatitis, rash, fatigue
rare: pneumonitis
other: hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypercholesteremia (manage these ae’s)

23
Q

temsirolimus in 1st line setting in poor risk pts (cat 1) -6

DO YOU USE 1ST OR 2ND LINE?

WHAT RISK SUBGROUP STUDIED?

REMEMBER PRIMARY CARE ISSUES

A

approved for 1st or 2nd line use

70% POOR RISK PTS (USE FOR THESE PTS)

25mg IV qweek (require diphen as premed) vs IFN

OS 10.9 vs 7.3 mo, PFS 3.8 vs 1.9 mo

combo of the TEM + IFN no benefit over temsirolimus alone

same ADR as everolimus

24
Q

IFN +bev vs IFN -2

DO YOU USE 1ST OR 2ND LINE?

A

approved for 1st or 2nd line use

PFS: 10.2 vs 5.4 mo (sig), OS: 21.3 vs 23.3 (NS)