Prudential Standard FSI 4.3 (Non-life Underwriting Risk Capital Requirement) Flashcards Preview

Actuarial F203 - General Insurance > Prudential Standard FSI 4.3 (Non-life Underwriting Risk Capital Requirement) > Flashcards

Flashcards in Prudential Standard FSI 4.3 (Non-life Underwriting Risk Capital Requirement) Deck (29)
Loading flashcards...
1
Q

3 Components of non-life underwriting risk

A
  • Premium and reserve risk
  • Lapse risk
  • Catastrophe risk
2
Q

Non-life underwriting risk

A

Risk arising from non-life insurance obligations, such as

  • poor claims experience
  • expense over-runs
  • policy lapses
3
Q

Optional adjustment to non-life underwriting risk

A

The non-life underwriting risk capital requirement also allows for an optional adjustment to account for the loss-absorbing or amplification capacity of insurance policies that involve an element of risk sharing between one or more parties of the contract.

4
Q

Risk may allow for the risk mitigating effect of eligible risk mitigation instruments, on the condition that…

A

care is taken not to double-count the impact thereof.

The risk of impairments from counterparty default on such instruments must be taken into account.

5
Q

Premium Risk

A
Refers to the risk of fluctuations in the 
- timing
- frequency, and
- severity
of insured events.

Includes the risk that premium provisions turn out to be insufficient to compensate claims.

Also includes the risk arising from expense volatility (expense risk).

Relates to insurance policies to be written or renewed during the period, and to unexpired risks on existing policies.

6
Q

Reserve risk

A

Refers to the risk of fluctuations in the timing and amount of claim settlements.

7
Q

Calculation of earned premium

A

Earned premium =
unearned premium provisions (brought forward)
+ written premiums
- unearned premium provisions (carried forward)

Earned premiums should be NET of applicable reinsurance.

Earned premiums may allow for expected policy lapse and cancellation rates, subject to such assumptions being consistent with those used in the valuation of technical provisions.

8
Q

Lapse Risk

A

Non-life insurance policies may include contractual options which influence the obligations arising from them.

Where such contractual options are included in a non-life insurance policy, the calculation of premium provisions must take into account the lapse risk associated with the exercise rates of these options.

Lapse risk is the risk that assumptions regarding the exercise of contractual options are different to those assumed in the valuation of premium provisions.

9
Q

Lapseshock 1

A

Lapsing of 40% of the in-force insurance policies for which lapsing would result in an INCREASE OF THE TECHNICAL PROVISIONS excluding the risk margin.

10
Q

Lapseshock 2

A

Decrease of 40% in the number of future insurance policies or reinsurance contracts that are allowed for in the valuation of technical provisions, but not in-force at the valuation date, where this decrease would result in an INCREASE IN TECHNICAL PROVISIONS excluding the risk margin.

11
Q

How should the lapse shocks be applied?

A

lapseshock 1 and lapseshock 2 must apply uniformly to all insurance policies and reinsurance contracts subject to lapse risk.

In relation to reinsurance contracts, lapseshock 1 must apply to the underlying insurance policies.

For the purpose of determining the change in the value of the Basic Own Funds under lapseshock 1, an insurer must base the shock on the type of lapse which most negatively affects its Basic Own Funds on a per policy basis.

12
Q

Catastrophe risk

A

The risk of loss, or of adverse change in the value of the insurance obligations, resulting from significant uncertainty of pricing and provisioning assumptions related to extreme or exceptional events.

Catastrophe risk stems from extreme or irregular events that are not sufficiently captured by the capital requirements for premium and reserve risk.

13
Q

2 Methods for calculating non-life catastrophe risk capital requirements under the Standard Formula

A

1) Standardised scenarios; and/or
2) Factor-based methods

(or a combination of these)

14
Q

When should insurers use Method 2 to calculate its non-life catastrophe risk requirement? (3)

A

a) Circumstances where the standardised scenarios under Method 1 do not adequately assess the risk profile of their insurance obligations.
b) Exposures outside of South Africa
c) Insurance business classified in the Miscellaneous, Agriculture - Equipment and Agriculture - Other (sub-)lines of business.

15
Q

The catastrophe standardised scenarios under Method 1 are broadly classified into 3 categories

A
  • Natural catastrophes
  • Man-made catastrophes
  • Catastrophe scenarios specific to inwards non-proportional reinsurance
16
Q

Method 1: Standardised scenarios

4 Natural Catastrophes

A

Extreme / exceptional events arising from perils such as:

  • Windstorm
  • Flood and subsidence
  • Earthquake
  • Hail
17
Q

Method 1: Standardised scenarios

8 Man-made catastrophes

A

Extreme / exceptional events relating to:

  • Motor
  • Fire to Property
  • Marine
  • Aviation
  • Liability
  • Consumer credit, Trade credit, Guarantees
  • Terrorism
  • Accident and Health
18
Q

Method 1: Standardised scenarios

How should the capital requirement for natural catastrophes be calculated?

A

As the maximum loss, net of risk mitigation, resulting from the following scenarios:

  • 1-in-200 year single Earthquake event
  • 1-in-200 year single Hail event;
  • or three distinct 1-in-10 year natural catastrophe events, plus a 1-in-20 year natural catastrophe event in the same year.
19
Q

Method 1: Standardised scenarios

How should the capital requirement for man made catastrophes be calculated?

A
As the SQUARE ROOT of: 
(
the SUM of  
SQUARED [ 
capital requirements, net of risk mitigation, after allowing for the impairment of the credit taken for risk-mitigation instruments 
]  
)
for events arising from:
- Motor
- Fire to Property
- Marine
- Aviation
- Liability
- Consumer Credit, Trade Credit and Guarantees
- Terrorism
- Accident and Health
20
Q

First-party insurance structures include (3)

A
  • Captive insurers
  • First-party cells within a cell captive insurer
  • First party contingency policies
21
Q

Simplifications for first-party insurance structures are allowed for, as such structures: (4)

A
  • Only underwrite the risks of their parent companies and operate as an extension of their parents
  • Typically have a simple risk structure compared to commercial insurers
  • Are limited in size and day-to-day management is normally outsourced
  • Generally have the majority of the risks reinsured
22
Q

Optional adjustment for insurance policies with risk sharing features

A

Adjusts the capital requirement for premium and reserve risk to account for the loss absorbing / amplification effect of insurance policies that involve an element of risk sharing between one or more parties to the contract (e.g. underwriting manager, policyholder, insurer and/or reinsurer).

The adjustment factor will be positive if there is a loss amplification effect and negative if there is a loss-absorbing effect.

23
Q

Calculation of the capital requirement for:

Motor catastrophe risk

A

The greater loss, net of risk mitigation, after allowing for the impairment of the credit taken for risk mitigation structures, resulting from the following scenarios:

a) A major motor collision in SA
b) A large accumulation of losses of multiple insured vehicles in a single location in SA

Cat = MAX( loss arising from a, loss arising from b),

24
Q

Calculation of the capital requirement for:

Fire catastrophe risk

A

Either one of the following methods:

1) Calculate the loss (net of risk mitigation) resulting from an insurer’s largest fire concentration; or
2) Calculate the maximum loss (net of risk mitigation) resulting from scenarios that take accumulation of risk into account

25
Q

Calculation of the capital requirement for:

Marine catastrophe risk

A

The greater loss, net of risk mitigation and excluding salvages, resulting from the following scenarios:

a) A collision between 2 container carriers, where the two container carriers are those where the insurer has the largest gross exposure (including marine cargo & liability)
b) A collision between 2 pleasure crafts or commercial fishing vessels, where the two vessels are those where the insurer has the largest gross exposure for hull and liability cover.
c) A claim from the insurer’s largest gross exposure to marine liability insurance.

26
Q

Calculation of the capital requirement for:

Aviation catastrophe risk

A

The greatest loss, net of mitigation (after allowing fro counterparty default impairment), resulting from the following scenarios:

a) A mid-air collision between 2 aircraft, where the aricraft vessels are those where the insurer has the largest gross exposure, and where the gross exposure includes 10% of liability exposures
b) The accumulated loss of all aircrafts insured in a single location due to a single event such as an explosion or a collision.

27
Q

To whom does the calculation of a capital requirement for terrorism catastrophe apply? (3)

A

Only to:

  • SASRIA
  • Insurers that provide top-up terrorism cover above that insured by SASRIA
  • Reinsurers that provide reinsurance for terrorism.
28
Q

Calculation of the capital requirement for:

Terrorism risk

A

The greatest loss, net of risk mitigation, resulting from the following scenarios:

a) A 1-in-200 year individual loss from a single terrorism event
b) A 1-in-200 year aggregate loss from 2 terrorism events
c) A 1-in-200 year aggregate loss from 3 terrorism events

29
Q

3 Scenarios to be taken into account for
Calculation of the capital requirement for:
Accident and Health catastrophe risk

A

MASS ACCIDENT SCENARIO:
Mass accident scenario to all individual and group policies providing benefits under the accident and health line of business.

CONCENTRATION SCENARIO
The accident concentration scenario to group policies providing benefits under the accident and health line of business.

PANDEMIC SCENARIO
The pandemic scenario to policies providing benefits due to hospitalisation.

Decks in Actuarial F203 - General Insurance Class (43):