Module 8 Flashcards

1
Q

Assume Farah has breached the contract. A court is likely to find the $4 500 cost of hiring ranger Nick is:

A

A direct loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assume that Farah has breached the contract. A court is likely to find the cost of Tom’s stay at TM Kennel (that is the cost Rhianna refuses to pay is)

A

A direct loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the likely result of Rhianna’s claim for $2000 in damages for distress due to Tom’s newly developed aggressive behaviour?

A

Unlikely to be successful in this claim as it is not a direct or consequential loss flowing from Farah’s breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is consumer law

A

Law that regulates consumer transactions and the std conduct of the business that produces goods and services

Consumers have limited info and bargaining power when dealing with corporate manufacturers and service providers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consumer law

A

Is a mixture of legislation and common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Legislation consumer law

A

Sale of Goods Act
Competition and Consumer Act 2010
Australian Consumer Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Competition and Consumer Act

A

Federal piece of legislation that operates AUS wide
Largely follows the TPA with two significant exception
- introduction of a consumer guarantee regime
- more nationally oriented product safety legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Misleading or deceptive conduct s18

A
  • Formerly section 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974
  • A person must not in trade or commerce engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive
  • Has a very broad application
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Components of s 18

A

A person
In trade or commerce
Engaging in
Misleading or deceptive conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A person includes

A

both natural persons and corporations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Misleading or deceptive conduct refers to

A

conduct that leads members of the public in their capacity as consumers of goods or services into error, or is likely to do so.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The test of whether something is misleading in a s 18 sense is the

A

meaning that would be given to the representation by an ordinary and reasonable member of the class of consumers to which the representation was addressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

McWilliam’s Wines Pty Ltd v McDonalds System of Australia Pty Ltd (1980)

A

Facts:
McWilliams Wines named one of its wines the ‘Big Mac’
McDonald’s who have a hamburger called the Big Mac claimed that McWilliam’s use of the name amounted to misleading and deceptive conduct

Issue: Was McWilliam’s use of the name misleading?

Decision: No the distinction between wine and hamburgers is clear so as not to confuse the relevant class of consumers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Taco Co of Australia v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982)

A

Facts: a mexican restaurant named “Taco Bell” opened in Sydney
Another corp in Sydney used that name for its Mexican restaurant over the previous five years. They brought action for misleading and deceptive conduct

Issue: was the newly opened restaurants use of the name misleading?

Decision: Yes because both restaurants sold the same type of food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Ltd

A

Facts: a Spanish company made perfume under the name “Nike Sports Fragrance’
Nike international was a large sports apparel company. The nike perfume was displayed in pharmacies underneath other sports fragrances including one by Adidas

Issue: could Nike sue for misleading and deceptive conduct

Decision: Yes it was, it would lead the class of consumers who purchase Nike to think the perfume was another product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Remedies for misleading or deceptive conduct

A
  • Injunction
  • Damages
  • Adverse publicity orders
17
Q

The meaning of ‘consumer’ under the ACL

A

S 3 of ACL provides definition of consumer
Person is taken to have acquired particular goods or services as a consumer if and only if
- the amount payable for the goods or services did not exceed 40 000
- the goods or services were of a kind ordinarily acquired - domestic consumption
- the goods consisted of a vehicle or trailer acquired for use principally in the transport of goods on public road

18
Q

A consumer transaction is not covered by legislation where they

A

were acquired for resale or for consumption by way of trade or commerce or in the course of repairing or treating other goods or fixtures on land

19
Q

Guarantee as to title s 51

A

there is a guarantee that the supplier will have a right to dispose of the property in the goods when that property is to pass to the consumer

20
Q

Guarantee as to undisturbed possession s52

A

Does not apply if the consumer was aware of any encumbrance

21
Q

Guarantee as to acceptable quality s54

A

Where goods are supplied to a consumer in trade or commerce other than by way of sale by auction there is a guarantee that the goods are acceptable quality

  • fit for all purpose will goods of kind are commonly supplied
  • acceptable in appearance and finish
  • free from defects
  • safe
  • durable
22
Q

Fitness for any disclosed purpose s55

A

If the supplier supplies in trade or commerce goods to a consumer other than by way of sale by auction then they must be fit for any purpose disclosed
- fitness is express or implied

23
Q

Guarantee as to supply of goods by description s 56

A

Guarantee that the goods supplied correspond to the descirption

24
Q

Guarantee as to supply of goods by sample or demonstration model s57

A

If a person supplies in trade or commerce goods to a consumer by reference to a sample or demonstration model and not by way of sale by auction there is a guarantee that

  • goods correspond with the sample or demonstration model in quality, state or condition
  • if the goods are supplied by reference to a sample the consumer will have a reasonable opportunity to compare the goods with the sample
  • goods are free from any defect that would not be apparent on reasonable examination, cause them not to be examinable quality
25
Q

Fitness for particular purpose s61

A

There is a guarantee that goods should be fit for a purpose disclosed by buyer

26
Q

Reasonable time s62

A

there is guarantee that when time frame of contract is not established goods or services be supplied within a reasonable time

27
Q

Services for which there are no guarantees

A

s63 provides that there is no guarantee in respect of transportation or storage or insurance

28
Q

Guarantees are non excludable

A

s64 provides that guarantees are not to be excluded, restricted or modified by a term in the contract.

29
Q

ACCC v MSY Technology Pty Ltd

A

Consumer product seller tried to have a no return policy but this is not able to be excluded

30
Q

Consumer remedies

A

Where there is a breach of a guarantee the consumer has a remedy against the supplier

The nature of the remedy depends on whether the failure to comply with the guarantee is a major failure

31
Q

A major failure arises if:

A

a) goods would not have been acquired by a reasonable consumer fully acquired with the nature and extent of the failure
b) the goods depart in one or more significant respects
i) if they were supplied by description
ii. . supplied by reference to a sample or demonstration model
c) the goods are substantially unfit for purpose for which goods of the same kind are commonly supplied and cannot easily and within reasonable time be remedied to make them fit for purpose
d) the goods are unfit for a disclosed purpose that made known to
i) supplier of the goods
ii) any person by whom any prior negotiations or arrangements in relation to the acquisition of goods without being remedied in reasonable time frame
e) the goods are not safe

32
Q

Consumer rights where failure can be remedied and is not a major failur

A

Consumer can require supplier to remedy within reasonable time
If supplier does not do so consumer can:
- reject goods and recover money paid
- have the failure remedied by another and recover reasonable costs from the supplier
- damages for loss or damage may also be recovered (only to extent that is reasonably foreseeable)

33
Q

Consumers rights where is failure is major that cannot be remedied

A

Customers choice to recover compensation for reduction in value (therefore keep goods)
Reject goods and have money returned
Damages for loss or damage may also be recovered

34
Q

Unfair contract terms

A

The ACL provides that a term within a consumer contract is void if the term is unfair and the contract is a standard for contract e.g. contracts for car rental, mobile phones… where there is no room for bargaining and the terms are imposed by the stronger party

35
Q

S 27

A

provides a series of tests that the court can apply to decide if a contract can be described as standard form

36
Q

Jetstar Pty Ltd v Free

A

lady changing airline booking
jetstar hit her with 900 dollar fee
took them to court
court didn’t find it unfair because it was made clear to her and similar to what other airlines charge