Homicide Flashcards Preview

Criminal Law > Homicide > Flashcards

Flashcards in Homicide Deck (39)
Loading flashcards...
1
Q

What’s the difference in homicide and criminal Homicide

A

Homicide is any act or omission that causes the death of another
Criminal homicide it involves culpability

2
Q

What was the original purpose of dividing murder into tiers?

A

Pennsylvania wanted to stop using the death penalty so much

3
Q

What is the defining feature of murder

A

Malice

4
Q

How’s the California penal code define malice?

A

Into 2 categories including express malice and implied malice

Express malice manifest deliberate intention

Implied malice defines homicide that was Unprovoked or circumstances showing malignant heart

5
Q

Is premeditation (common law) or aggravating circumstances (MPC) Better for parsing the worst murders from the rest?

A
  • Premeditation it is more morally culpable and more deterrable but not a great proxy for evil
  • Aggravating circumstances catch more metrics of moral evil
6
Q

Where is the defining characteristic of first-degree murder?

A

Premeditation

7
Q

What are two definitions of premeditation?

A

Carrol definition:Premeditation can be satisfied in the same instant as the killing act (no need to prove actual reflection or any lapse in time, no real difference between 1st and 2nd degree here except that 1st can’t accommodate reckless)
Guthrie Definition: No particular time between intent formation and execution is required but must prove actual contemplation (If only for a second-can be proven circumstantially)

8
Q

Where is the Anderson rule for proving premeditation?

A

1-Planning Indicates design to kill
2-motive indicates prior relationship is a reason to kill
3-manner of killing indicates planning

9
Q

Can second-degree murder include recklessness?

A

Yes but malice is still required

10
Q

What are the two kinds of second-degree murder?

A

1-depraved heart murder where no intent is required but evidence of a wicked depraved & malignant heart which shows disregard for human life (question of degree from manslaughter)
2-Any murder that is not First degree

11
Q

What is the MPC distinction between first and second-degree murder?

A

Second-degree murder: Purposeful or knowingly killing OR Recklessness showing extreme indifference to human life [Depraved heart murder]
First-degree murder: Any second-degree murder with an aggravating circumstance

12
Q

What are the two defining feature is the manslaughter?

A

1-Lack of malice & Provocation (Voluntary manslaughter)

2-recklessness (Involuntary manslaughter)

13
Q

Is the provocation defense an excuses or justification?

A

It is a partial excuse

14
Q

What constitutes sufficient provocation for the provocation defense?

A

Majority approach: Categories are used, Words are not enough per Girouard
Minority approach: Is a question of fact if provocation was sufficient and cool down time was insufficient (Judge determines sufficiency before sending to jury)

15
Q

What are the pros and cons of the provocation defense

A

Pros: Provoked murders are less deterrable, more understandable & cannot be solved with incapacitation
Cons: Sexist,Benefits angry,Blames victim,Reasonable people don’t kill regardless

16
Q

What is the three-part test for common law voluntary manslaughter?

A

Per Maher
1-Subjectively distressed
2-Distress must be objectively reasonable to the circumstance (Reasonable can be formulated Descriptively or prescriptively)
3-There is in adequate cool off time(objectively)

17
Q

A common law how much negligence is required for involuntary manslaughter?

A

at Common Law Gross negligence is required.

This can be modified by statute See State v Williams

18
Q

What is the Welanski Rule for manslaughter?

A

Recklessness does not require subjective of knowledge of the risk
1-Defendant is reckless if a reasonable person would’ve recognized the rest
2-Defendant is reckless if defendant subjectively recognize the risk
3-Difference in recklessness under Welanski & non-criminal negligence is a question of magnitude of the risk ignored by the actor

19
Q

Where is the MPC’s version of the provocation defense

A

Called emotional disturbance.
Broader than common law
Does not have a specific triggering event requirement or a specific cool off limitation
They must still be a subjective mental disturbance And an objective reasonable explanation for the ED

20
Q

What are the 4 MPC requirement for involuntary manslaughter?

A
Checklist
1-what is the risk substantial
2 - was the risk unjustified?
3 - was this a gross deviation from the expected standard of care
4 - conscious disregard for the risk?
21
Q

Contributory negligence is never a defense to criminal liability

A

believe it

22
Q

What’s the difference in manslaughter and non-criminal negligence?

A

The magnitude of the risk ignored (per People v Hall)

23
Q

What’s the difference in manslaughter and depraved heart murder?

A

Neither requires intent but the character of the actions distinguish

24
Q

What does the felony murder doctrine do for the prosecution?

A

A theory to establish malice- felony murder is not a separate crime (kind of like depraved heart)

25
Q

What are the problems with felony murder?

A

1-the punishment is distributed very unevenly
2-the punishment is not proportional to the crime
3-has a little deterrent effect because the possibility is remote
4-would be better to increase the punishment on the underlying crime in order to evenly distributed across those who commit it

26
Q

Felony murder creates strict liability

A

believe it

27
Q

What is the MPC’s version of felony murder?

A

It’s not very widely followed.

Felony murder becomes a rebuttable presumption that the felon was reckless in order to satisfy second-degree murder

28
Q

What are the five limitations on felony murder

A

1-only homicide committed in furtherance of the felony counts (Transactional limitation)
2-agency theory of felony murder
3-no liability for death of Confederates
4-narrowly construe statutes enumerating felony murder eligible felonies
5-merger doctrine

29
Q

What is the agency theory a felony murder?

A

It establishes that no one is responsible for a homicide and was the actors actually or constructively theirs (excludes deaths caused by the police or a third-party)`

30
Q

What are the 2 approaches to narrowly construing felony murder statutes?

A

The abstract approach limits felony murder more than he has applied approach

31
Q

What is the merger doctrine for felony murder?

A

It prevents certain underlying crimes committed in furtherance of the homicide from creating a basis for felony murder.

32
Q

Where is the Ireland rule for merger for felony murder?

A

The underlying crime merges with murder if the underlying felony is included in fact in the homicide

33
Q

What is the “independent felonious purpose” rule for felony murder?

A

If there’s a felonious purpose independent of causing bodily injury the crimes will not merge
(for example armed bank robbery robbery would not merge)

34
Q

What is the Farley rule for felony murder?

A

Enumerated felonies never merge

35
Q

What is the Chun Rule for felony murder?

A

When the underlying felony is assaultive in nature the underlying felony will merge with homicide

Assaultive involves a threat of immediate violent injury (abstract approach)

36
Q

What is the misdemeanor manslaughter rule?

A

If death is caused during the commission of a misdemeanor recklessness is presumed under the misdemeanor manslaughter rule

37
Q

Is the discretionary death penalty constitutional?

Is a mandatory death penalty constitutional

A

No - per Furman v GA on 8th And for discretionary

No on mandatory

38
Q

What is the two step test under Greg v Georgia that determines if the death penalty is still constitutional?

A

1-does the death penalty accord with evolving standards of decency that Mark the progress of maturing society
2-does the death penalty a chord with basic dignity of man

39
Q

What are the 2 procedural requirements for the death penalty according to Furman?

A

One-bifurcated procedure (sentence and guilt separately determined)
Two-guidelines for the jury (legislatively determined list of aggravated circumstances)