Creation and Evolution use same facts.
True
True / False
Creation and Evolution both take faith to believe in,
True
The origin debate really comes down to assumptions about God.
True
Natural selection is able to create new things.
False, takes away things.
The cell is a simple, easily reproducible unit of life.
False, cell is complex
Co-option can explain why the the development of bacteria flagellum.
False, cannot
There are no examples of matter giving rise to info.
True
Info is the result of intelligence or natural processes
False
Intelligent design can be recognized in improbable patterns of specificity.
True
Healthy science seeks the truth, and let’s evidence speak for itself.
True
Darwinian evolution has produced a living cell.
False
Evolutionists must explain where genetic instructions come from, or now Proteins develop directly from amino acids without DNA.
True
It takes a lot of factors for a habitable planet to exist.
True
There is nothing special about planet earth.
False
There is consistency in the laws of physics/chemistry in the universe.
True
There is Goldilocks habitation zone in our solar system and galaxy occur.
True
Fundamental forces must be in perfect balance for life to occur.
True
Copernicus attributed the universe to natural processes.
False, to a Creator
MATCHING 1
Archaeopteryx
Flight feathers
Urey Miller experiment
Wrong gases, no oxygen
Haeckel’s embryo
Fraudulent drawings
Comparative vertebrate anatomy
Common use, design
Missing links
Still missing
Eternal and uncaused
First cause
Theistic evolution
Death before Adam
No examples
Macroevolution
Slight variations within genetic boundaries
Microevolution
Four winged fruit flies
No muscles
Antibiotic resistant bacteria
Low fitness cost
Peppered moths
Staged fraudulent drawings
MATCHING 2
Spontaneous generation, life from non life
Abiogenesis
New structures, species, added genetic info
Macroevolution
Minor variations
Microevolution
Similar ancestors
Common descent
Guided, purposeful external influence
Artificial selection
Unintelligent, purposeless process
Natural selection
MATCHING 3
Source of DNA
Problem for evolution
Spontaneous generation
Problem for evolution
Complexity of simple molecular machines
Problem for evolution
Prove God exists
Problem for creation
Life produces after its Kind
Problem for creation
Life produces after its kind
Problem for evolution
DNA similarities in different species
Problem for creation
Transitional forms are missing
Problem for evolution
No beneficial mutations
Problem for creation
Laws of thermodynamics
Problem for evolution
First cause
Problem for evolution
Bibles is a scientific textbook
Problem for creation
Anthropoid principle
Problem for evolution
Eye and ear
Problem for evolution
Cambrian explosion
Problem for evolution
Patterns for reproduction
Problem for evolution.
Feathers
Problem for evolution
Evidence of young earth, solar system, and Galaxy
Problem for evolution
Information in sequences proteins
Problem for evolution
Short Answer
What are 3 fundamental entities?
Matter
Energy
Information
What is your conclusion concerning the validity of evolution or creation ?
- Both take faith (faith in God & faith of Science)
- the validity will never be 100% validates bc we cannot see the past. Both theories are philosophical arguments, not ideas that can be proven with evidence. Both are unanswered questions
What are 3 ways missing links can be interpretative? Give an example. What’s your conclusion? Why? (Name your missing link.)
Human - Java man
Ape - nutcracker man
Fraud - Lucy
What’s your missing link?
What’s your conclusion about your missing link?
What is your personal conclusion about your missing link? (2)
Name the 6 planks of evolution, and explain how valid each plank is.
Natural selection, struggle for existence - valid
Name two animals that defy evolution, why?
- Bombardier Beetle, no way it could evolve sequential explosions keeping him from blasting off
- Woodpecker, 2 toes in front and back, 10 inch tongue, tail feathers, cartilage, Closes eyes
What are the 3 flawed assumptions in radiometric dating? Why are these inaccurate?
Circular reasoning :
- Rock layers - fossils are dated by rock layers which are dated by fossils which are dated by assumptions
- Carbon - 14 exists in all fossils = young
- K-AR assumptions:
- amount of parent, daughter isotope is only altered by decay
- daughter isotope was 0
- rate of decay is constant