1 - Poverty Flashcards

1
Q

Two different ways of viewing development - narrow vs broader view:

A

A narrow way of looking at development is to say that it’s about levels and rates of growth. A broader way is to think of the quality of life and focus on the freedoms and “unfreedoms” that people may have.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The book’s view on development:

A

“Achieving development is about reaching a satisfactory level of human wellbeing, both on average and for everybody in a particular society”:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

7 dimensions of underdevelopment:

A
  1. Low avg income and growth.
  2. Material poverty, hunger and food insecurity.
  3. Income inequalities
  4. Vulnerability to shocks and poverty traps.
  5. Lack in basic needs, health and educ.
  6. Natural resources scarcity.
  7. Low Q of life: freedoms, human rights, happiness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Triangle of development 1

A

Describes the main objectives: low poverty, growth and small inequalities. They all affect each other and they all differ for different societies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tringle of development 2

A

The three main actors to make growth happen:
1. State
2. Market
3. Civil society
Important in different ways and all can fail. Complement each other, but can also substitute at some degree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Two parameters we measure with poverty:

A
  • Indicator of wellbeing (y): ex income or consumption.

- A cut-off (z)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pros and cons with using consumption?

A

Pros:

  • Closer to wellbeing than income.
  • More smooth out over the year and over years.

Cons:

  • HH-level, not individual.
  • Measurement error - Cannot remember exact consump.
  • How to measure different goods such as durables, home-prodcued, public etc?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Wellbeing: HH vs individual

A

Wellbeing is individual but hard to measure it that way - we consume mainly on the HH-level: such as food, electricity, public goods in every family.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Per capita consumption in the HH:

A

Ypc = Cf/n* + ph(Ch/n*^B)

This measures the private goods divided by adult equivalent (weight of adult-isch) + the price of public good times the consumption of goods with publicness that is divided by adult equivalents and raised to B.
B is the degree of private vs publicness.
0 public, 1 private.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must be adjusted for being able to compare across time and space?

A

CPI so that inflation are accounted for and also PPP so that price levels in different countries are taken into consideration.
It’s harder than it sounds - what is a normal basket of goods? What is the counterpart of different goods in other countries. Small changes can have huge effects on the poverty rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Absolute poverty line:

A

An absolute value of a minimum income that one must have to live the most basic life. Subsistence level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Relative poverty line:

A

The subsistence level related to the average income. A person is only poor if she/he is poor related to the society she/he lives in. Otherwise almost none should be considered poor in Sweden.
Related to cost of social inclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nutrition based poverty line

A

Start by looking at a downward sloping calorie-expenditure function (in the left side if y so that more calories=higher cost) then we find the point where calories=enough to survive, ex 2000, and follow that height over to the 45 degree budget constraint to see how much is needed to afford these calories. Lastly, also find the point at the Engel curve (for normal godos) - this is where we set z, the poverty line.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Weakly relative poverty line

A

A way of combining absolute and relative poverty lines - it rises when average income exceed the absolute poverty line. So it includes the cost of social inclusion and the fact that we relate our wellbeing to others. If the avg income rises in Swe but mine is the same –» I become relatively poorer so the line must change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The absolute poverty line for the world

A

It is set by the World bank at PPP 1.25 dollar. (ps, problem with PPP as people around the world don’t consume same things).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

7 desirable properties of a poverty measure

A
  1. Monotonicity axiom - when income fall for a poor person, the measure must increase.
  2. Transfer axiom - Redist. from poor to a less poor should increase poverty.
  3. Transfer sensitivity - it should matter HOW poor the person is that is involved in a redist.
  4. Decomposability - possible to decomp. into sub-groups.
  5. Proportion of poor - if the share of poor increase, the index should increase.
  6. Population symmetry - size of the population should not matter. Only the share.
  7. Focus axiom - income changes among rich don’t influence it.
17
Q

Headcount ratio=

A

H=q/n. The number of poor as a share of the total population.

18
Q

Which two properties does H fail to satisfy?

A

The monotonicity and the transfer axiom - changes within the poor does not affect the poverty in this measure. –> Reduce poverty easiest by focusing on the poor close to z rather than the very poor.

19
Q

Shortfall:

A measure of the poverty gap

A

A measure of money needed to bring the poor people to the poverty line:
Sum over q: (z-yi).
I.e sum the difference for all the poor.

20
Q

FGT version of poverty gap:

A

=Shortfall/nz
= (z-yi) /nz.
To divide by the z makes it independent of currencies and divide by population makes it OK with population symmetry.

21
Q

What does alpha do in the P-alpha indicator?

A

It raises the (z-yi)/z to the power of alpha.

  • So if a=0 it gives us the headcount ratio.
  • If a=1 gives the FGT poverty gap.
  • If a=2 gives a severity of poverty index or the squared poverty gap- caring about the level of poorness.
    Alpha can be interpreted as aversion to deep poverty as the larger it is, the more weight is given to the poorest.
22
Q

P2

A

The squared poverty gap. Ok with transfer axiom but not the transfer sensitivity.
If a>2 we add transfer sensitivity. Why is it that?

23
Q

Poverty trap

A

Set of self-reinforcing mechanisms whereby individuals (or countries) who start poor, remain poor.
Poverty causes poverty.
But this trap can be a level different from z.

24
Q

If you are poor and you can produce little by little and invest and get out, are you trapped then?

A

No. Poverty trap = no escape.

25
Q

Ex of individual level traps other than economical?

A
  • Nutritional
  • Investment/credit constraints
  • Behavioral
  • Geographical
26
Q

Three dimensions of poverty:

A
  • Transitory poor - average income/consumption above z but sometimes below.
  • Chronic poor - average below z but sometimes above.
  • Persistent poor - always below.
27
Q

Vulnerability to poverty=

A

The probability to be poor in the next period. An ex-ante concept that we decide in t=0 by looking at expected (E) income in next period and its variance.´(SD).
Related to how close to z you are and possible shocks.

28
Q

How do the poor live? Mention some characteristics that are common:

A
  • Extended households
  • Short-term migration
  • Lack of access to finance
  • Multiple income sources, not specialized.
  • Low calorie intake
  • No using public services fully.
  • Heavy burden of decision making
29
Q

Elasticity of income of the poor w/r to average income

A

On average shown to be =1. Substantial heterogeneity - see notes!
China had 0.8, brazil 4.3 (growth + social programs, India 0.4 (growth not pro-poor and social programs bad targeted).